Where is the line between fitting and actual patterns? - page 12
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
If the drawdown exceeds the test one by 3 times - then we are screwed )))) How not to let that happen? )))
The question is not what patterns, but how to find a training period and an OOS period for the patterns.
))
To be honest, I've been thinking for over a week about creating a thread called
"Correlation of optimization and testing periods. Or optimization of optimization periods...".
Or fitting the second instance... (Sorento).
And here's where the question is: What patterns and confirmations of their workability do we want to find? -- comes to the forefront.
If the drawdown exceeds the test drawdown by a factor of 3, then we are screwed )))) How can we prevent it? )))
I wiped my flub, but can't let you know because I keep deleting this post.
Appreciated your humour)
But the merchants, as you can see, are silent....
Do you think we should ask for a third time? We're not proud....
Or shouldn't we?
Well for example a way to reduce the lot at a drawdown. It will be too big in pips, but not so big in money :)
This is self-deception.
In the process of developing the TS, the lot must be constant.
(Again, slyly.... )
1. Appreciated your humor.)
But the merchants, as you can see, are silent....
2. Do you think we should ask for a third time? We're not proud....
Or shouldn't we?
1. Trying.
2. Already asked.
Here is the equity of one system that exploited volatility. It was calculated based on 2007 volatility increased at the end of 2008 and started to decrease substantially. Unfortunately, DC rolled back the transaction history of old periods quarter by quarter, but still a little bit visible.
This strategy may have worked for several symbols (currencies) with the appropriate settings? If so, then you're the first to find the grabble)))
If I look at the chart for a major, the graphs are very similar to each other, provided that visually we need to account for the profit value per pip and therefore the patterns for the dollar exist, then according to the subtext - if after selecting the parameters for TS, TS can work for several majors (each with its own settings) - so TS works according to patterns, but not adjusted for the historical period
2. Already asked.
Don't compare yourself to the merchant class ;-)
They have very different chains of logic.
This strategy may have worked for several symbols (currencies) with the appropriate settings? If so, then you're the first to find the grabble)))
for the major charts are very similar to each other, provided that visually we need to consider the cost per pip profit, and so the patterns for the dollar exist, then on sub-soot - if, after selecting the parameters for TS, TS can work for several major (each with its own settings) - then the TS works according to patterns, but not adjusted for the historical period
Igor, look, there was an optimisation with three parameters, each with 10 values (agree, this is very modest).
A total of 1000 passes.
How to select the only final set (FN) of values of parameters? What are the selection criteria?
Do you know the answer to this question?
Without answering it, there is no point in going any further!