What form, let's assume a physical body, does time have? Your opinion. - page 33

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
If we manage to prove in this "argument" that the past does not exist,
because it's already "long gone" and the future doesn't exist (it hasn't been built for us yet),
then we can consider that the existence of time has been proven, and we will give it a form (even a soldier's form).
The difficulty lies in proving the non-existence of the past and the future.
drop me a line )
This information is more useful here.....
There are quite a few GRAIL seekers here....
Drop me a line.)
It's not a secret or personal - anyone can have it. Here's a link to a more or less tolerable description and there is also a list with codes. But be warned at once - the text is in English :) http://habrahabr.ru/blogs/crypto/66079/ I mean, the cryptogram is in English, but the story itself is in Russian.
P.S.
I have Simon Singh's The Book of Codes. It elaborates on this story in more detail. It says that the author of these cryptograms (Biel) was a gold digger. He and his friends dug up treasure and Biel asked Morris to share the treasure with the families of his friends and his family. In those troubled times, those gold diggers must have perished.
It's not a secret or personal matter - anyone can have it. Here is a link to a more or less decent description and there is also a list with codes. But be warned, the text is in English :) h ttp://habrahabr.ru/blogs/crypto/66079/
The difficulty lies in proving the non-existence of the past and the future.
But if we can prove the non-existence of the past and the future,
then we prove that we don't exist at all, because the "present"
has even less right to exist than the past and the future.
The difficulty lies in proving the non-existence of the past and the future.
But if we can prove the non-existence of the past and the future,
then we prove that we don't exist at all, because the "present"
has even less right to exist than the past and the future.
here's a man ah-ah, will look at the water and prove to everyone around him that it doesn't exist )))
It was and will be, but is it there?
She was and will be, but is she there?
The difficulty lies in proving the non-existence of the past and the future.
The difficulty is in proving existence.