A question about discreteness (just don't hit the table too hard for being off-topic) - page 6

 
Dersu:

It's for me, it's for me. Honestly, EVERYTHING I do understand, I don't.

Nah. I'm talking to him, the original starter. Sorry for the confusion.
 
Nilog: I asked a question about discreteness, not about how much smarter you are than me.

Nilog, they tried to answer you, but you are not interested in the answer - don't you care either? Then open the volume of quantum electrodynamics and read it carefully. There, at the level of theoretical physics, it clearly spells out what you want.

And don't expect any more adequate answers from adequate people, forever. Be content with the lean gruel you seem to enjoy.

 
All right, guys, don't mention it, I've got to get to work.
 

Mathemat:

Mathemat:

Nilog, they tried to answer you, but you are not interested in the answer - don't you care either? Then open the volume of quantum electrodynamics and read it carefully. It clearly spells out what you want at the level of theorophysics.

And don't expect any more adequate answers from adequate people, forever. Be content with the lean gruel you seem to enjoy.


I see.

Well, at least you know which is right and which is left.

Good luck

 
Dersu:
All right, guys, don't mention it. I've got to get to work.

That's just it. :)

 
Nilog:

I recently read in a thread here that there is discretion in forex too - "just like everywhere else in this world".

I don't give a damn about forex. Not having a maths background, it's hard for me to appreciate the case. But I don't understand discreteness in the physical sense - if there is a connection between discrete components, roughly speaking corpuscles (quarks or whatever else they come up with, leptons) - what does it physically manifest itself in? How does it spread? By corpuscles as well? But how does one corpuscle know about the other? How do they interact? Is the field also discrete? But then how are the discrete components connected?

For the trader, the higher discreteness step is, the more profitable it is ( that's why there are no tick charts and it's impossible to check Ask and Bid values in any given second...). For us - traders it is vice versa... ( the possibility to read such information is a guarantee of successful trading robot's work)
 
sllawa3:
For the trader, the greater the step of discreteness, the more profitable it is ( that's why there are no tick charts and we can't read Ask and Bid values at any given second )... For us - traders it is vice versa... ( the possibility to read such information is a guarantee of successful trading robot's work)

Not enough information for you to trade?

And just that little(tick history, ask and bid, bets...) is not enough?

So get it from third-party providers. Morningstar, for example. :)

Would a true dancer be hindered by an extinguished light?

;)

 
Sorento:

Not enough information for you to trade?

And just that little (tick history, ask and bid, bets...) is not enough?

So get it from third-party providers. Morningstar, for example. :)

Would a true dancer be hindered by an extinguished light?

;)

It's not a bit... it's the basis... and with this bit of information you don't need any other information to build a successful system!
 
this is nonsense: in mt market info we have access to every second of the session, but we don't have the most important information - the exact price to this very segunda...!
 
sllawa3:
this is nonsense: we have access to every second of the session in mt market info, but we do not have the most important information - the exact price to this very segunda...!

Heisenberg's priniciple has been discovered...!

Congratulations

;)