Martingale: the maximum possible chain of continuous losses/profits - page 4

New comment
 
Tantrik:
ADX indicator.

indicators are rubbish, I don't trust any of them.
 
sever30:


:)

I'm sorry, I haven't heard...

In the question of the first post, gave the example of roulette, I care about the maximum chain of continuous red or black falls in a long enough series of bets, such as 1,000,000.

A continuous chain is a trend. Chain length - are there trends for 1-2 years?
 
sever30:

Indicators are bullshit, I don't trust any of them.
After you get over the martin, you'll switch to indicators.
 
Tantrik:

Going against the trend - but at the end of the trend.

And why do you need a martin if you know the end of the trend?
 
vasya_vasya:

if so, by averaging he means trading against the trend, if so, by trading against the trend he means what.

I think these are philosophical questions for someone who is trying to create a grail based on martin.

What are you creating a gra il based on?

In the question of the first post, gave the roulette example, what matters to me is the maximum chain of continuous red or black rolls for a sufficiently long series of bets, e.g. 1,000,000.
In a casino you can make it so that there will always be one loss (constantly red or constantly black).
 
goldtrader:
The problem is that you do not know the end of the trend, so why would you need a martin if you already know the trend's end?


+100.

the question, so to speak, is super.

In reality, martin is from the gorge.

Give me a 50/50 entry, as long as the series of looses is no more than 6.

Preferably, they should be more frequent. Then you can live with a martin.

 
vasya_vasya:
Avalanches and martins fail because they do not have a market model, all entries are random.

All entries are always random. The chart has several differently directed trends and flotsam - all this on different TFs and where the price moved can then be explained by the TA.
 
goldtrader:
And why do you need a martin if you know the end of the trend?
It's not for me, it's for the North! (there's one explanation for this kind of trading - don't think)
 
sanyooooook:

What are you building a grail around?

in a casino you can make it a constant loss (always red or always black)


i suggest without the "you can make it so..." the example was based on a random number generator...

as in the Meta Driver counting in the trailer of the first post.

 
sanyooooook:

What are you building a grail around?

Based on the market model
1234567891011...16
New comment