You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I think Integer is the only option if you need a number.
It doesn't seem like a difficult question.
Ten pages already. It doesn't seem like a difficult question.
Pixels are a good way to measure it.
What's so great about it? I have stretched the price chart window - its length in pixels has changed. Changed the timeframe - the same.
And what good would that do? I have expanded the price chart window - its length in pixels has changed. And if you change timeframe, the time frame has also changed.
It is clear to everybody. But apparently, it works for the customer.
--
You were sent to see a spider, why not go? Not a solution, of course, but it would add a little insight.
What good is that? I have stretched the price chart window - the length in pixels has changed. Changed the timeframe - same thing.
It is necessary for relative percentage comparison. You can stretch and shrink as much as you want - everything is cool.
Needed for a relative percentage comparison. You can stretch and shrink as much as you like, all tic-tac-toe
But what to do if the line ends are outside the window and are not visible - therefore have no graphic coordinates of the pixel, and the pixel itself does not exist?
But what if the line ends are outside the window and are not visible - therefore have no graphic coordinates of the pixel, and no pixel itself?
You misunderstand. We are converting to a single unit of measurement through the scale of a square pixel. We don't work with the screen and its pixels at all. Take a look at the function.
You don't get it. We are converting to a single unit of measurement through the scale of a square pixel. We don't work with the screen and its pixels at all. Look at the function.
Yes, I have already looked at it and understood it.
If it's about comparing at the same moment, then yes - it works. If that's all it takes, then problem - solved.
I forgot to post the adapted code, maybe someone will need it
B1 and B2 are bar numbersThe code is not correct.
.
Because you can have indicator windows on the chart - this is one
(in this case, the height of the price window is unknown - and we get the total height) .
.
Secondly, it has exactly the error I was talking about -
when scrolling the chart left and right, the coefficients change.
to convert the price into pixels.
The Integer option is the only one, if you need a number.