Interesting advisor - page 4

 
I didn't know ..... could be cruel) So it's a fitting after all?
 

And actually, this is quite interesting:

  if (Year() < 2008) return (0);
   if (IsTesting() != TRUE) {
      if (IsVisualMode() != TRUE) {
         if (AccountNumber() != gd_100 && AccountNumber() != gd_108 && AccountNumber() != gd_116 && AccountNumber() != gd_124) {
            Comment("=============================", 
               "\n", "EXPERT STOPPED! Invalid Account", 
               "\n", "For the help to mailto: sgibnev@bk.ru", 
            "\n", "=============================");
            Print("EXPERT STOPPED! Invalid Account");
            return (0);
         }
      }
   }

There's also protection by merchant account number. Anyway, it's not good to go digging around in decompiles :)

It's not worth the effort, it seems to me.

 
Mathemat:

Once again: solve the equation relative to TotalEquityRisk and substitute the calculated value in the external variables:

And post the test under your deposit here - along with the hat.


Tried to change the values - doesn't work, seems to be limited to nine, 9.5, 9.9 doesn't work...
 
Mathemat:

Anyway, it's not good to dig into the decompiles :)


It may not be good, but it is useful. What is important is the principle of work. The principle is averaging, as sergeev pointed out.

So, it is possible to make non-decrypting EAs on this principle.

As for the account, it is clear from the website. The Expert Advisor is prepared for a particular user.

 

Well, what a non-sinker they are, according to rulabs:

Трындец наступил на EURUSD 10.03.2005 в пять утра

 

And here is the principle itself, if the advertisement is to be believed: http: //www.finware.ru/downloads/articles/ATCF.pdf

 
DekanFF:
I didn't know ..... could be brutal) So it's a fitting after all?

That's what I'm saying... and you don't believe me :)

this expert is on sale for $20. grail of shit :)

 
sergeev:

That's what I'm saying... and don't you believe it :) this expert is on sale for $20. grail of shit :)


Who's hiding the fit? It says FATL, SATL, etc. etc. And the fact that they are adapted in 2008, so that in 2005 it and

it probably won't work.

 
Richie:

And here's the principle itself, if you believe the blurb: http: //www.finware.ru/downloads/articles/ATCF.pdf

interesting article... and most importantly from ten years ago...

by the way, why do you think it's based on it?

 

Yeah. Found it in the dock... Right.


it seems to me that it has been corrupted by adding averaging. or rather, by lowering it to averaging, as a result of which the algorithm inputs have lost all meaning. it may as well be open both ways at any time.

If you don't lose by 2008, you may lose in 2010.

Reason: