Interesting advisor - page 8
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
they have been in the codebase for a year now
https://www.mql5.com/ru/code/8867
So? Or is it a game to find 5 links and get a bonus?
I did it once: it's really better to generate filters on a specific pair, timeframe and quotes (i.e. OCs). But in general you can use the posted filters (the closest one is EURUSD), selecting 1H-1D timeframe depending on the timeframe of DT (quotes).
If you need a filter generator, I can lay it out.
Do a good deed, post it.
And actually, this is quite interesting:
There's also protection by merchant account number. Anyway, it's not good to poke around in decompiles :)
I don't think it's worth the effort.
Let me tell you guys, having constructs like:
should be a red flag.
This is amateurish code.
A normal coder will write it:
If the coding is like this, then even if there is some idea, the question arises: "How well is it implemented in the EA?"
The constructions are equivalent, there is no terrible mistake in the given code. Well, some people like brevity (I like the second variant better too, by the way), while the author likes what he calls readability.
Yes, there is a lot of redundancy in the EA, an excessive number of string global variables, there are other shortcomings. Nevertheless, a working code of this size is already an achievement.
Yes, there is a lot of redundancy in the EA, an excessive number of string global variables, and other shortcomings. Nevertheless, a working code of this size is already an achievement.
I'm not being facetious, I'm not being facetious.
I'm just saying.
The constructions are equivalent, there is no terrible error in the above code.
I'm not talking about mistakes, I'm talking about style.
Do a good deed, post it.
http://fx.qrz.ru/
https://www.mql5.com/ru/articles/32