SProgrammer писал(а)>> Forex is 98% maths, and economics, and economics is 100% maths. And programming is almost mathematics, because mathematics is programming in terms of mathematics. :)
Did you come up with that yourself? Just now? )) You're an inventor ))))
I've read a lot of books on trading, but I haven't come across your brilliant assertions anywhere. So there is no point in googling about anything - a waste of time. ))).
LeoV писал(а)>> I've read a lot of books on trading, but I haven't come across your brilliant assertions anywhere. So there's no point in googling about anything - a waste of time. ))).
Well, I've been hired to debunk your stereotypes. :)
Я только против того чтобы - "чтобы ни говорить лишь бы говорить". А Свинозавр именно это и сделал. :))
In forex, it is not profitable to be against. It is advantageous to be "for". ;-)
Did you come up with that yourself? Just now? )) You're an inventor ))))
Did you come up with that yourself? Just what? )) >> You're such an inventor. >>)
No it's obvious to everyone. :)
Making it up again? Handsome.....))))
Making it up again? >> hottie.....))))
Use google. :))На форексе быть против не выгодно. Выгодно быть "за". ;-)
This is where I want to ask the question: to be against whom and to be for whom?
This is where I want to ask the question: to be against whom and to be for whom?
That's what I wanted to ask too, by the way.
I've read a lot of books on trading, but I haven't come across your brilliant assertions anywhere. So there's no point in googling about anything - a waste of time. ))).