Avalanche - page 511
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The parameters are the same, starting at 20,000.
Too risky.
As for the horizontal chart, it has to be stressed that it is too risky. i managed to keep it clean and it does not fill up, i let it flow and indicated that i ran from 2008 till 2009, from 10 000 it turned out to 21250, so on. the drawdown came to 70%. i take it as a base trading account. it means if i deposit 100 RUR, while if i deposit 1000 RUR it comes to 100 000 RUR, which means i can parallel trade on 10 currency pairs that i can trade with no big drawdowns in theory of probability. Of course in the year for 1000 cu to get a plus of about 800 cu it's too small, but the result is positive. Of course I want to get a plus of 10 000 cu in a year for 1000 cu.
1. too risky.
2. i tried to use my tester chart, it did not fill and i showed that i had tested it from 2008 till 2009 and it turned out to be 21250 from 10 000 or something like that. the drawdown went up to 70%. i take it as an account of trade on a cent account. this is 100 cents, while 1000 cents is 100 000 and so i can trade on 10 currency pairs that, in theory of probability, will not cause significant drawdowns. Of course in a year for 1000 cu to get a plus of about 800 cu it's too small, but the result is positive. Of course I want to get a plus of 10 000 cu in a year for 1000 cu.
1. For me - acceptable - a relative drawdown of 10%, with this kind of profitability - that's fine. Profitability under 2.0 - also for Avalanche - good!
2. This is what happens when you diversify too much with too many currency pairs:
Read his forum... the whole thing.
P.S. I, myself has not yet started, poured in and look at this fellow - a member of one of the club days ...
1. For me - acceptable - a relative drawdown of 10%, with this kind of profitability - that's fine. Profitability under 2.0 - also for Avalanche - good!
2. This is what happens when you diversify too much with too many currency pairs:
Read his forum... the whole thing.
P.S. I, while not starting out myself, poured over and watched this fellow participant in one of the club days...
I don't have an Avalanche. I have my own, written by me. based on my ideas.
i know that you do not know where you will fall, so you need to be prepared for a fall, so you know what to do and how to do it!
so I'm still not putting my owl in the real, still modifying it.
1. For me - acceptable - a relative drawdown of 10%, with this kind of profitability - that's fine. Profitability under 2.0 - also for Avalanche - good!
2. This is what happens when you diversify too much with too many currency pairs:
Read his forum... the whole thing.
P.S. I, while not a starter myself, poured in and look at this comrade - a member of one of the club days...
Parameters are the same, starting at 20,000.
It's interesting when two people work independently, each creating their own TS based on different principles (I have a two-way averaging martin), but the results are quite similar).
It's interesting when two people work independently, each creating their own TS on different principles (I have a two-way averaging martin), but the results are quite similar).
Yeah, especially on the expectation matrix... :-)
Yuri, you're out of competition again... :-) Take the same profitability... On my variants it rarely ever goes over 2 or, even less so, 3... :-)
Simply in this plan I have separated flies and cutlets :-), i.e. Avalanche (starting next week) and Ilan (averaging) - I have not combined them together yet...
Subject, still - ACTUAL!!! :-)
Who earns in real money using a similar kind of TS, no desire to share the algorithm of the expa?
For those who are still in the dark, here are the links to the description of the BASIC version of the avalanche:
past the first page of the thread, one, two, three, four...(but in general, those interested should read the whole thread! :-))
Has anyone heard of John Catan? How is he? Does he chop/no chop?
Yes, but by Candelabra. It's simpler and requires less attention.
О! John, good to read you!
Send references or describe this TS(all info in this branch, right?), I have this Candelabra somewhere in the archives... I'll deal with it together with spread trading: one, two, three - this is the description of TS. IMHO - promising and reliable trading direction!