Avalanche - page 7

 
arnautov писал(а) >>

Of course it works. What am I arguing?

Below is the tester report. Pair, testing period and step between orders are chosen absolutely out of the blue.

In total, the cent account would have had 435 dollars of profit in January of this year.

So, who wants to earn money instead of thinking about the strategy please send 150 rubles to R676367339866 :)


Your order spacing is 70 pips, it's ok, but 70 pips is a lot, try it with a 20-25 pips step on the pound/bank.

 
JonKatana >>:

Почти все - неверно. Расстояние подбирается элементарно - я уже дал пример. 40...60 пунктов между уровнями для EURUSD вполне достаточно.

Оптимизировать ничего не нужно. Точка начала тестирования (то есть входа в рынок) - полностью произвольная, в ЛЮБОЙ момент времени - от этого ничего не изменится. В этом мощь "Лавины" - входить можно когда угодно, невзирая на цену.

Речь в этой теме о торговой системе, а не о религии - поэтому вера или неверие здесь ни при чем. Проверять нужно вам - я знаю, что "Лавина" работает.

Советник мне не нужен даже бесплатно.

The smaller the distance between the orders, the better.

1. We need a broker with a spread of EURUSD 1.5 pips GBPUSD 2.0 pips.

A broker without stoplevel orders, preferably, we also need the possibility of placing pending orders within the spread, as well as the possibility of placing counter orders.

3. Working with a range of 5-7 pips.

4. Increase the opposite side of the geometry *3

( EDIT) 5. The pile can be closed in parts, i.e. not the whole block at once . For example, we have the third cycle, two losing, four (six) in the plus. Let's close one losing one and two (three) are in the plus. Probably, we got into a trend - this is one, we went lower by a cycle - this is two.

I wish this broker had a mechanism (not MT's)

 
goldtrader >>:


Вы хоть понимаете что пишете?
Цена идёт в ЛЮБУЮ сторону и Вы получаете прибыль. Сказка.

Быстрее на реал эту "Лавину". И главное чтобы профитом не завалило.

There are times when, no matter which way you turn, the profit is still dripping.
A similar system has been multiplying 10 times as much on the real, for two years now. I just had to have sex with it for a year. I am trying to monitor my account on oknix, but I have no luck yet, support decides what the problem is, there are tens of thousands of transactions during the year. As for the quiet trading, the system gives 50% a month and breaks once in three months (20% of volume with a 30-point gap). After the tripling of the deposit the system may either increase the lot or become even more comfortable, which positively affects the number of entries into the tray (~ once a year) and thus pleases investors :)
 
So who will make an EA as described in the first post?
 
JonKatana писал(а) >>
I may have reinvented the wheel, but nevertheless: I propose a win-win trading option that allows you to enter the market at any time on any instrument. The two requirements are to have a human at the terminal and to calculate the initial lot correctly. Now the description:
Two orders - BuyStop and SellStop of equal volume are placed at the same distance from the current price. When one of them triggers, the other one is removed and the same order is placed in its place, but the volume is equal to twice the initial rate. When the price turns and the second order triggers, the same order is placed exactly for the price of the first one but with the volume tripled, etc. If the price initially goes in one direction - you just fix your profit when you want. If the price moves in both(three, four, etc.) orders - you just have to wait until it will pass the same distance as between the initial orders - from this point, the total balance is in the plus.


You are wrong.
In your case (the volume increases with each step by the value of the initial bet), after the 3rd U-turn it will take more distance than the starting zone to exit to the BU.

 
PapaYozh писал(а) >>


You are wrong.
In your case (volume increases with each step by the value of the initial bet), after the 3rd U-turn it will take more distance than the starting zone to enter the BU.


Is there such a coefficient of lot increase, when the distance to breakeven would remain constant?

 
sever29 >>:


а есть ли такой кооф. увелечения лота, при котором расстояние до безубытка оставалось бы постоянным?

We need to work with statistics and adjust the step opening between orders so that we always have enough depo. At least it is better to divide it into sessions, and at most it is better to divide it by hours with "watching" the statistics for the next hour. We should thoroughly analyse the Americans at the session opening, after lunch, and at closing. It's a lot of work. In my EA there is a variable step_null, which prescribes the number of points for each session or hour, which we simply stupidly skip, and then start to open every 5-10 points. TP and stability of the system immediately increases. And when max drawdown is reached, the Expert Advisor locks

 
sever29 >>:


а есть ли такой кооф. увелечения лота, при котором расстояние до безубытка оставалось бы постоянным?

In this post I have derived a formula which is used to calculate the Breakeven level. The following lot sequence is required to keep the breakeven distance constant:

1st reversal: Lot_B = 0.1; Lot_S = 0.2

2-nd reversal: Lot_B = 0.1+0.3; Lot_S=0.2

3rd reversal: Lot_B = 0.1+0.3; Lot_S=0.2+0.6

4th reversal: Lot_B = 0.1+0.3+1.2; Lot_S=0.2+0.6

Turn 5: Lot_B = 0.1+0.3+1.2; Lot_S=0.2+0.6+2.4

......

 
PapaYozh писал(а) >>
You are mistaken.
In your case (volume increases with each step by the value of the initial bet), after the 3rd U-turn it will take more distance than the starting zone to enter the BU.


I've already tried to explain this 2 times. But faith in the grail is invincible :)

 
vasya_vasya >>:


Как раз наоборот из поста автора ясно, что он расчитывает на удачу.

Quote, otherwise it's a lie.