[Archive!] Pure mathematics, physics, chemistry, etc.: brain-training problems not related to trade in any way - page 445
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I'm talking about you programmers sitting around manually going through the options... Why?
You see the point here.
It's a ritual..... custom
Fighting with yourself for the right to be smarter than a computer. Being able to use your one and only neural network.
A mathlete or a metadriver, when they think.... they get a kaaaaiffff..... inexpressible feeling when they find the true solution.
And the truth, it's intoxicating in its simplicity. and when the solution is found, everyone's neural network is in a state of ecstasy..... and it's more than a drug....
you can't live without it....
You see the point here.
It's a ritual..... custom.....
Fighting with yourself for the right to be smarter than a computer. Being able to use your one and only neural network.
Math or metadriver, when they think.... they get a kaaaaiffff..... inexpressible feeling when they find the true solution.
And the truth, it's intoxicating in its simplicity. and when the solution is found, everyone's neural network is in a state of ecstasy..... and it's more than a drug....
you can't live without it....
That's funny.) Well good luck to everyone then)
And the truth, it is intoxicating in its simplicity. and when the solution is found, everyone's neural networks are in a state of ecstasy..... and it is more than a drug....
Yeah, right. By the way, scientists (British, I think) say that those who constantly train their brains live longer.
P.S. I posted the problem on the forum of mekhmata. Let's see, what they will say there.
P.P.S. MD, I don't like something about B's calculations at the very end...
P.P.S. MD, I don't like something too much computing at the B end...
I've already been told at Mechmatov that it's a bojang...
A bojang is an indication of its antiquity, but there must be a solution...
Fermat's great theorem is also ancient. And even proven. But people will be coming back to it for a long time to come...
The solution to the sages' problem is on the internet. No author is given. How right it is, I don't know.
But how to come up with such a problem, I can't understand it at all :)
I still haven't found a single complete solution. There is a beginning of reasoning, which is quite literate. And then it goes on like this: "it's only 1 candidate for a couple of numbers, but the uniqueness of the solution is not obvious". And so on. And they refer to the necessity of computational verification.
2 ValS: a British guy proved it in 1996. But this proof is fully understood by probably few people in the world.