LOSING TRADING SYSTEM - page 3

 
ZEXEL66 >>:

сотрудничество

Let's get to the point, sometimes very simple ideas can hide a lot of potential.

 
kernelmd >>:

Ну дык, опишите стратегию, посмотрим что можно сделать.

I do want to put it out there. But only if several programmers would be interested or one would really

to sit down, write a code and prove that this TS is unprofitable. The point is, there could be a lot of entries

many entries every day. Just looking at the price chart and analyzing the price movement of the day, the beginning or

or end of the trading session, whether there will be important news on that day, later or not, etc., I make

decide whether to enter a trade or not. But it cannot be automatically filled in. You need more

It needs more precise criteria, and maybe we should use different filters for entry and exit. Which way to go,

I don't know.



 
ZEXEL66 >>:

Я и хочу выложить. ...

.... Каким путем идти,

представляю.

It's not boring at all.

 

Let's go beyond that. Give us more indices which are able to drain the entire deposit in 10-20 trades if

money management. I will be very happy. I really need it.

 
jartmailru >>:

Это что у них за байт, если семерка заполняет знаковый бит ?!


Maybe something made in china
 
ZEXEL66 >>:

Я и хочу выложить.

fpired!

Just looking at the price chart

uh, ))

 
Richie >>:

Давайте не ограничиваться. Дайте индюков побольше, которые способны за 10-20 сделок слить весь депозит при соблюдении

управления капиталом. Я буду очень рад. Мне это очень нужно.

ONCE AGAIN, FOR THOSE WHO DON'T UNDERSTAND. I'M NOT GOING TO PROVE TO ANYONE THAT IT'S A PROFITABLE SYSTEM.

I'M GOING TO PROVE THAT IT'S UNPROFITABLE. AND ON THE MACHINE IT'S UNPROFITABLE SQUARED. I JUST DON'T KNOW WHY,

IT'S JUST MY GUT FEELING. AND IF 20 INDICES WILL BRING THIS SYSTEM CLOSER TO FAILURE AND YOU HELP ME WITH IT...

THEN I'M COMPLETELY RIGHT IN MY GUT FEELING ABOUT IT.

 

ZEXEL66, You don't have to prove anything. I am asking for myself. I want a lot of "bad" turkeys. I'll turn them inside out.

I just want really bad ones, really bad. Not 49.9%.

 
ZEXEL66 писал(а) >>

ONCE AGAIN, FOR THOSE WHO DON'T UNDERSTAND. I'M NOT GOING TO PROVE TO ANYONE THAT IT'S A PROFITABLE SYSTEM.

I'M GOING TO PROVE THAT IT'S UNPROFITABLE. AND ON A MACHINE, IT'S UNPROFITABLE SQUARED. IF 20 INDUSERS ARE GOING TO BRING THIS SYSTEM

THIS SYSTEM IS A LOSER AND YOU HELP ME WITH THESE INDICES....THEN I'M COMPLETELY RIGHT IN MY INNERMOST

ABOUT IT.

Too many words.

 
ZEXEL66 >>:

Опять никак не определишь. Допустим по паре евро/доллар есть штук 10-20 возможностей для входа в день

Причем такие возможности будут и по парам евро/фунт, евро/австралиец и т.д. Что интересно...они возникают

в разное друг от друга время. Такое редко бывает. Обычно доллар или надо покупать против всех валют

или надо продавать.


У меня 2 ветки. Больше не будет. Еще заинтересовался темой со спрэдами, так как очень хорошо, как трейдер,

понимаю то что там происходит. Согласитесь...программисты-практики месяц создавали индюки, написали

хороший эксперт, протестили на демо, запустили его не реал и даже получили прибыль...я взглянул один

раз, не как программсит, а как трейдер и нашел ошибку...ту о которой месяц никто почему-то не думал...

Вот вам и смысл сотрудничества о котором написал в другой ветке.

"...practitioner programmers spent a month creating an indicator, wrote a good Expert Advisor..." - a few hours is enough.

If YOU are a trader, offer the "programmer-practitioner" an TS, and you will get an indicator, or an expert in a couple of hours. BUT it won't work - because: YOUR TS doesn't work in the real market.

Conclusion: Before you give a TS, formalize it (TS). When YOU do, make sure it (the TS) does not make a profit.

Conclusion 2: Write expers WITHIN, or buy (pre-losing).

PS

The "practitioner programmers" themselves have a lot of trading experience.

Reason: