
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Do you think anyone would want to spend time trying to figure out the logic behind a sinking Expert Advisor?
At the very least, many would like to prove that all the adaptive trading robots out there are leaky.
>> Imagine how good it would be for investors - take the report - once and prove that the Expert Advisor is a sinking one - you can save a lot of money.
>> your advisor looks like elusive joe, and why is he elusive, who needs him?)
However, "Downloaded: 4128."
Strange people - they download completely unnecessary things, and then spend a lot of time on unnecessary conversations :)
However, "Downloaded: 4128."
Strange people - downloading completely unnecessary things and then wasting a lot of time, on unnecessary conversations :)
Yeah, and the more you rant about unnecessary things, the more people will download to check the unnecessity.
However, "Downloaded: 4128."
Strange people - downloading completely unnecessary things and then wasting a sea of time, on unnecessary conversations :)
They download under the influence of an author's certificate, sci-fi envelope and other PR tricks,
like the hyperlinks you put in a few of them on every page.
I do not think that your Expert Advisor has interested even a single investor in your PAMM.
Downloaded under the influence of copyright evidence, sci-fi envelopes and other PR tricks,
like the hyperlinks you sprinkle on every page.
I do not think that your Expert Advisor has interested at least one investor who has invested in your PAMM.
It does not matter at this stage.
When the PAMM goes uphill - the "ground" will be prepared.
It does not matter at this stage.
When the PAMM goes uphill, the ground will be prepared.
the holy simplicity of netreboks
See my test results.
Do you trust the MT4 tester? If you don't trust it, it's not a question for me.
You don't read the earlier posts very well. I already said that in the tester, I draw a straight line from the bottom left to the top right corner.
What for? In the tester, there is a forward test, there is a demo, there is a real, there is monitoring of both, demo and real.
You trust the tester - "these questions are not for me", because there is optimization in the tester.
There is no need to make fools of everyone around, because everyone has already seen enough ellipsoids or straight ups. And the practice is completely different.
Are you a forex theorist? Well, then move on to pure theory, without EAs.
Frankly, you remind me of medical theorists who have never seen a real patient.
Nothing personal, as soon as you have at least a monitored demo with your Expert Advisor, I will really get into your development.
You know, I know mathematicians, very reputable people in their field of expertise, but, so far their knowledge has not brought anything as pure theory.
Like, building a mathematical model of EVERYTHING. They are idealists and the forum is 99% realists. Draw conclusions as this is not your target group to sell your creation.
p.s. I don't mean to offend you, and I don't intend to. Just want to see something real, other than tests and screenshots. Passed the stage, believe me :)
You know, I know some mathematicians, very reputable people in their field of expertise, but, so far, their knowledge has yielded nothing, as pure theory.
Like, building a mathematical model of EVERYTHING. They are idealists.
Nothing at all?! That's creepy. I never thought professional mathematicians were so stupid...
Nothing at all?! That's creepy. I never thought professional mathematicians were so stupid.
There is theoretical mathematics, and the people who do it are not stupid. It's just that so far they are mathematical world-building theories.
Perhaps these people have other goals, and so far it is not possible to apply their theories.
With your nickname, you do know (or have heard) about string theory. What I have heard on this theory is that mathematicians in this field of knowledge assume 12 dimensions (mathematical) of space. I'll try to find you a movie on the internet on the subject
string theory wikipedia
String Theory movie.
p.s. I'm not a mathematician, so don't ask me questions about string theory. >>) that was just a diversion.
Very interestingly, Simons, head of the renowned Renaissance Foundation and a hardened practitioner, is just one of the founders of string theory.