"The 'perfect' trading system - page 98

 
registred писал(а) >> Not true. The size of the required profit for tomorrow should have. ;)

This parameter is maximised. ))))

 
LeoV >> :

This parameter is maximised. ))))

I agree - a perfect one shouldn't.

 
Svinozavr >> :

>> I agree - a perfect one shouldn't.


In purely mathematical terms that would mean buying the galaxy the day after tomorrow. Not like Abramovich with his pathetic yacht:)

 
registred >> :


In purely mathematical terms it would mean buying the galaxy the day after tomorrow. Not like Abramovich with his pathetic yacht:)



Do you know the difference between ideal and real? )))

 
registred писал(а) >>

In purely mathematical terms that would mean buying the galaxy the day after tomorrow. Not so much for Abramovich with his pathetic yacht:)

If there is a perfect trading system, why not...))

 
LeoV >> :

If there is a perfect trading system, why not...))

Even theoretically the volumes raked out of the market are finite and where is the price of galaxy hanging ?

 
Mischek писал(а) >> Even theoretically, the volumes raked out of the market are finite and where does the price galaxy hang ?

Price negotiable ))))

 
Svinozavr >> :

Do you know the difference between ideal and real? )))

I sure do! I don't want to get my head bashed in by a wagon of notes. That's why the system needs at least one optimization parameter, at least in terms of time, so that I have time to run after the wagons, unloading the wagons.

 
Mathemat писал(а) >>

VictorArt, make it clear what a 'carrier' is - not just pictures alone.

May I be in favour of it?

I think it's the antipode of "being."

 
PapaYozh писал(а) >>

May I be in favour of him?

I think it's the antithesis of "essence".

>> don't swear.)

Reason: