Specialised service for hosting automatic trading systems - page 12

 
beginner >> :
Got access to the service today, but only for 2 days, thanks a lot for that, ask if anything.

Why not for three hours?! =)


You too lazy to bring a certificate from the building committee to the dealer?!

 
RIV >> :

I can extend you a little ... till the end of Sunday ... so you can study this weekend ...

They're not fools in the C.C.C. Fly to the sun at night! (с)


Balabob, can you show me the logs where you perform 9 operations from your mega-serviceman in 5 seconds?

 
RIV >> :

I.e. be more active, get in touch with "well-wishers" on the forum, maybe they can give you some good advice ... as for "at least a month" for the test, as you write, it's not realistic ... I'm not Mother Teresa ...


I don't need much from such a service, namely communication quality and smooth operation, this can only be tested by time, what can I say after 2 days of work is not a period of time. Does it make sense to test the performance of the machine? The terminal doesn't seem to be that demanding, and it seems you are ok with that. Maybe someone else is interested, I will check.

 
 
Maybe there was a problem with the DC server, I'll try them now.
 
beginner >> :
Maybe there was a problem with the DC server, I'll try them now to find out.

I should have put the terminals on several different DCs. If all of them failed, it was mega-server's problem. If only one, then only one brokerage company has problems =)

 
>> beginner

I understand what you need from the service ... I just look at it from a different angle ... because stability and connectivity depends more on the physical environment and the amount of money invested in equipment ... i.e. this task is easier than the problem of power and network security in the pps ... and I positioned my service as something in between renting a dedicated server and regular pps ... ie you have the weakest of our machines in the test and I am curious as you would rate it on capacity ... then looked at the network, ie would you see there at least one is not your connection ...

Now looked at where this terminal is connected to ...

It was found that the ping to the server of this broker from us in the region 134 ms, and trace long and partially closed, but for the piece that is visible that the server is not in Russia ... ie you test what we have access to foreign providers ... and our service is designed for brokers whose servers are in Moscow ...

If something new has changed on the server then it will see it and update itself, usually the update time is set to night when there is minimal activity in quoting and users ...

You need to put a couple more terminals from brokers whose servers are in Moscow ... and compare the connection ...

>> wise

I will reply to you in case the topic goes to page 3 or beyond ... so your chatter was at least somewhat useful ...
 

I agree... it's all very unconvincing and very un-serious...

 
wise >> :

Usually?! That's how the fuckers are set up. Allow the server to update itself whenever it wants, without checking for updates on a separate test server. This is another megalomaniacal megalomaniac.

It's not a question for me, it's a question for the brokers' staff... Unfortunately most brokers' servers are on auto-update... I update metatrader servers only manually and on weekends ... but that's not the subject of my service ...

 
RIV >> :
>> beginner

Your view that clients need a 1ms ping on MT4 is more than strange. Given that there is no functionality to work or test with ticks, the vast majority I think work on minutes, above or manually.

"Our service is designed for brokers whose servers are in Moscow".

"You have a lot of links to Moscow backbone and you can't follow the packet path? Who do your packets go through? Providers have to support tracing.

>>"You need to put a couple more terminals from brokers whose servers are in Moscow... and compare the connection..." - find with whom is the best connection and be stunned by the coolness of the ping?

Reason: