Question on genetic optimisation - page 5
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Fitted the best optimization and forecasting parameters obtained since the beginning of the year, the picture is not impressive:
When tested against these parameters from June 1:
The number of profitable trades exceeds the number of losing trades, the average profitable trade more than the losing one is a very good sign. In my opinion, you should not give up on this system, you should study its behaviour on a longer period. You can also put it on another cross.
On EURUSD, it's hanging at the level of the initial deposit.
On AUDUSD:
On EURGBP:
Why at the opening prices? You could try it on all ticks... But it's better to put it on a demo, you can do another system, and let this one pound... Since the tester is only an imitation... Although, the demo is also an imitation, but it is more visual...
Why at the opening prices? You could try it on all ticks... But it's better to put it on a demo, you can do another system, and let this one pound... Since the tester is only an imitation... Although, the demo is also an imitation, but it is more visual...
Something is not quite correct with respect to all ticks, I should sort it out, besides, the optimization for all ticks will generally last a month.
It is too early for demo, I have not done it for Sell. The system is not reversible, we cannot use mirror signals one to one, besides the Sell logic is somewhat different. I have not finished a lot of tasks, I have worked out only entry/exit signals so far.
Digging deep :-)
You're digging deep :-)
What do you mean?
Well, I mean, seriously taken on board...
Why at the opening prices? You could try it on all ticks... But it's better to put it on a demo, you can do another system, and let this one pound... Since the tester is only an imitation... Although the demo is also an imitation, but it's more visual...
What's wrong with the opening prices if your Expert Advisor just looks at the formed bars? I don't know the system under discussion, but if so, it doesn't make sense by ticks. How do closed tester bars differ from closed bars in real life? The tester's inconsistency problems are only in the artificial generation of ticks, and if one does not pips on them, then this optimization is quite adequate. Although, of course, virtual money is not a pity for plummeting, but is it worth to put on a demo what is plummeting in the tester?
As far as I understand, bars have a maximum and minimum value in addition to the opening and closing price, which can have an impact... Well, the author knows best...
The thing is, all four closed bars have the same OHLC - it doesn't come to the tester from the ceiling, but from the same online. The only problem that often appears is the mismatch between different timeframes, but it can be solved by recalculating the bars, and it affects not only the tester, but the real one as well (no corrections are made yet).