EA N7S_AO_772012 - page 14

[Николай]

These are my set files for the coming week,

I prepared them on L5, I put them on demo with L7. According to the market signals they are good.

[Дима]

SHOOTER777 >> :

These are my set files for the coming week,

I prepared them on L5, I put them on demo with L7. They're going to be the same as the market signals.

>>Thank you, Shooter!!!

[[Deleted]]

I think it lacks check when opening orders, sometimes it does things like that... You can build some disable indicator into your Expert Advisor, it would be good to check it once in a while.

[Alexandr Andreev]

mpeugep 01.02.2009 23:15

SHOOTER777 писал(а) >>

Это мои сет файлы на предстоящую неделю,

Готовил я их на L5, ставлю на демо с L7. По рыночным сигналам они идетичны.

Спасибо, Шутер!!!

+1

[Николай]

ZKostik писал(а) >>
This is a very good Expert Advisor, dear developers, but it seems to lack check during order opening because it sometimes does that... I would not expect that the EA would fail. You may build in your EA some switchable indicator, it helps to check it once in a while.

Can you be more specific about who is doing what?

We need to get to the bottom of this. Because I've only noticed oddities with the terminal.

Some of the billing parameters are displayed in the upper left corner.

[Alexander Sevastyanov]

SHOOTER777 >> :

Can you be more specific about who is doing what.

Connected to forward testing.

Started L7_2 with the latest set of set files.

1398099 Alpari demo Shooter

Build 217, M5.

[Alexandr Andreev]

SHOOTER777

took your sets, tested on the euro quid

n7s_ao_eu_02-02_demo_2

Period		5 Minutes (M5) 2009.01.19 01:00 - 2009.01.30 22:55 (2009.01.19 - 2009.02.02)
Model		All ticks (most accurate method based on all smallest available timeframes)
Parameters		Trd_Up_X=true; slx=500; px=18; x1=62; x2=12; x3=71; x4=71; Trd_Dn_Y=true; sly=900; py=16; y1=85; y2=97; y3=39; y4=72; Text0="BTS F=1"; F=1; pz=3; z1=8; z2=0; z3=56; z4=24; Text1="BTS"; G=4; Text2="XXXXXXXXXXXXX"; slX=500; pX=20; X1=33; X2=63; X3=65; X4=92; Text3="YYYYYYYYYYY"; slY=500; pY=22; Y1=86; Y2=94; Y3=36; Y4=64; Text4="ZZZZZZZZZZZ"; pZ=19; Z1=17; Z2=54; Z3=71; Z4=88;
Bars in history	3826	Modelled ticks	124105	Simulation quality	90.00%
Plot mismatch errors	4
Initial deposit	10000.00
Net profit	-89.88

Did I make a mistake?

[Николай]

wenay писал(а) >>

took your sets, tested on the euro quid

n7s_ao_eu_02-02_demo_2

In the archive my runs on three different accounts with different "cockroaches" are all normal.

What kind of broker, how many digits does he use?

If four then my set files have to be edited.

[Alexander Sevastyanov]

SHOOTER777 >> :

In the archive my runs on three different accounts with different "cockroaches" are all normal.

Shooter, can you trust that kind of modelling quality when testing on ticks? :

Simulation quality	n/a
Error mismatch plots	100456

[Николай]

Anyway, here's what I've managed to optimise for the new week. There are five pairs in total.

As a test: USDJPY at 1H.

I will use parameters of Shuter for all missing pairs. State at the end of the week :)

My personal opinion - it is redundant to set a trawl in this EA. As an option, it should not be activated right away, but after triggering of some exit signal and having previously pulled stops up to the end.