Gentlemen, where should the money go? - page 4

 
Mathemat писал (а) >>

If I had to choose from a dozen, I'd go with maximich. It's going reliably. Betelgeuse is out of the sky, but reliability in the current environment is probably better than super profits.

YuraZ wrote :>>

"Literate" banks will withstand the days of crises

The "illiterate" will fall.

Exactly. Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac are all illiterate rednecks. I don't know why you messed with them...

well I wasn't exactly being correct - I agree with Alexei

I've had my share of bad luck.

--

but they did say they made mistakes.

--

in our terms, they were in a loss-making position with no stop-loss.

--

the mortgage banks were already going under in 2007!

isn't 2007 a signal for those who have an excessive mortgage portfolio?

they understand that the term is short and one year is not enough for them - sometimes mortgages are given for 10-20 years or more.

--

for example, today it is very difficult to take out a mortgage from a Russian bank!

a lot of people just stopped dealing with it.

hence the cuts in construction - freezing housing prices - even the fall in value - and so on is a real thing.

many developers are already having problems because they can't get credit for their production

The idea is that those who build with their own money will survive.

 
timbo >> :

Very ill-timed advice. Russia is on the brink of default. The young ones in particular, I understand, were still in school in 98, i.e. they are not aware of what happens to bonds, and naively think "you won't lose anything".

Money should be converted into dollars and euros and stashed in a mattress. Or invest it in a natural product, in real values: grits, salt, matches. In Murmansk the stoves-burners and the fuel reserve are especially actual.

Justify the analogy between the year 98 and 2008 in Russia.

Better scare the people of Ukraine or Hungary

 
sabluk писал (а) >>

Justify the analogy between '98 and 2008 in Russia

Better scare the Ukrainians or Hungarians.

and for me '98 was a good year.

The car I bought was a Mercedes.

garage - luxury

another one-- 3-bedroom flat.

---

for ridiculous money!

---

I didn't buy matches - a fireplace with fuel too ...


We need a crisis!

 
BARS >> :

Not related to MMM by any chance?


No, it's not.

It's a credit service. It's like a bank, but viral. WMZ rules there.

I don't recommend it as a source of credits.

But as an investment vehicle it's excellent. 30% per annum, no problem.

[Deleted]  
sabluk >> :

Justify the analogy between '98 and 2008 in Russia

You better scare people in Ukraine or Hungary.

He who has ears to hear, let him hear. He who has eyes let him see. Fools do not even learn from their own mistakes.

Here is a follow-up article - http://www.ej.ru/?a=note&id=8508

 
meta-trader2007 >> :

No, it's not.

It's a credit service. It's like a bank, but viral. WMZ rules there.

I don't recommend it as a source of credit - the interest is very high.

But as a means of investment it is excellent. 30% p.a. no problem.

Nonsonsons just; advise not to take credits in it (and because of that they get profit, that the capital in turnover constantly), but on interest - put it there!

It's crazy.

 
timbo >> :

He who has ears to hear, let him hear. He who has eyes shall see. And fools do not even learn from their own mistakes.

Here is a recent article as a follow-up to this topic - http://www.ej.ru/?a=note&id=8508

I don't want to read literary fiction.

On RBC one analyst said that in August the U.S. launched a campaign to save the dollar by destabilizing the situation in the eurozone and Russia in particular...

South Ossetia is one of the links in the chain of this company

sanctions against Russia...

The articles that have been ordered to cause panic (a chain reaction to cash withdrawals from ATMs) and the spreading of rumours of a Russian default are also one of the links

 
sabluk писал (а) >>

I don't want to read literary fiction

On RBC one analyst expressed the view that in August the U.S. launched a campaign to save the dollar by destabilizing the situation in the eurozone and Russia in particular...

South Ossetia is one of the links in the chain of this company

sanctions against Russia...

The articles ordered to cause panic (chain reaction to withdraw cash from ATMs) and rumors of Russian default are also one of the links

aha! The US has bankrupted its banks, a lot of Americans have suffered

only to have Russia and Europe default

and the director of the crisis, the US government!

( like their businessmen: you guys are screwed here - we'll take care of Russia and Europe at your expense )

( I think this is nonsense) - he has not woken up from his Soviet days, he has not recovered from his Soviet way of thinking.

---

But the yen is getting stronger! Surprisingly!

By his logic it should be going down!

[Deleted]  
sabluk >> :

I don't want to read literary fiction

On RBC one analyst suggested that the US in August started a campaign to save the dollar by destabilizing the eurozone and Russia in particular...

Use Occam's razor. Consider any statement in terms of common sense. For example, compare the budgets of Russia and the United States and think about what impact a very good or very bad development in Russia would have on the economy and finances of the United States. The answer is none in any scenario. Russia is a third world country equal in every way to Nigeria - http://www.esquire.ru/articles/30/5minutes/

Would destabilising Nigeria help the US in any way? Then why would it be expected to destabilise Russia?

 
YuraZ >> :

Aha! The U.S. bankrupted a lot of American people

only to have Russia default.

( I think this is nonsense )


The timeline is wrong.

The campaign started before the banks went bankrupt.

we are not talking about bank failures.

look at the euro/dollar chart from august to today, the company's goals are being achieved (strengthening of the dollar)

and the rouble against the dollar has also fallen