I think Figar0 has a more reliable solution, I recommend to use his EA.
I would use his EA for real trading, but it is a bit risky: no protection against news, no trailing stop (at least a trivial transfer to Breakeven). Besides the strategy will be profitable only during the trend.
>> Is it worth breaking my neck for this primitive strategy? I thought it had long been clear that EAs based on the intersection of two averages can only be used as a training example for MQL programming.
It's not worth breaking a bone over this primitive strategy. I thought it had long been clear to everyone that EAs based on the intersection of two averages can only be used as a textbook example for MQL programming.
I wouldn't bother so many people just to give them a training example for programming)
I think Figar0 has a more reliable solution, I recommend to use his EA.
I would use his EA for real trading, but it is a bit risky: no protection against news, no trailing stop (at least a trivial transfer to Breakeven). Besides, the strategy will be profitable only during a trend.
Can't we add a trailing stop or b/o? I think if it shows well, it may happen. I do not want to guess.) Let me post testing results here after optimization and we will try to estimate its value together)
StatBars писал(а)>> Feel free to use it, if you have any corrections you can write here.....
I want to thank you for your participation in this thread. Thank you very much, I hope you will take part in the discussion about the test results in case you like it)
Can't you add a trailing stop or b/o afterwards? I think that if it performs well, it is possible. I don't want to guess, though...) Let me show you the results of testing after optimization and we will try to estimate its cost together)
I advise to leave at least one month for OOS during optimisation
The strategy has a small grain, a breakout and its confirmation by overcoming the extremum, but 15M timeframe is too small for such a strategy. 1H or 4H IMHO. And of course all these EAs need improvement for the real trade.
Allow the use of cookies to log in to the MQL5.com website.
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.
You are signed in. Two-factor authentication has been disabled. Set it up again and scan a new QR code, or continue with two-factor authentication disabled.
I think Figar0 has a more reliable solution, I recommend to use his EA.
I would use his EA for real trading, but it is a bit risky: no protection against news, no trailing stop (at least a trivial transfer to Breakeven). Besides the strategy will be profitable only during the trend.
>> Is it worth breaking my neck for this primitive strategy? I thought it had long been clear that EAs based on the intersection of two averages can only be used as a training example for MQL programming.
It's not worth breaking a bone over this primitive strategy. I thought it had long been clear to everyone that EAs based on the intersection of two averages can only be used as a textbook example for MQL programming.
I wouldn't bother so many people just to give them a training example for programming)
Is it worth breaking a spear ...
You shouldn't. Yet you write posts in this thread -)
I think Figar0 has a more reliable solution, I recommend to use his EA.
I would use his EA for real trading, but it is a bit risky: no protection against news, no trailing stop (at least a trivial transfer to Breakeven). Besides, the strategy will be profitable only during a trend.
Can't we add a trailing stop or b/o? I think if it shows well, it may happen. I do not want to guess.) Let me post testing results here after optimization and we will try to estimate its value together)
Feel free to use it, if you have any corrections you can write here.....
I want to thank you for your participation in this thread. Thank you very much, I hope you will take part in the discussion about the test results in case you like it)
You shouldn't. Yet you write posts in this thread -)
Then I'm just surprised... If you're initially convinced it's not worth doing, then why did you write an advisor? I'm just perplexed)
Can't you add a trailing stop or b/o afterwards? I think that if it performs well, it is possible. I don't want to guess, though...) Let me show you the results of testing after optimization and we will try to estimate its cost together)
I advise to leave at least one month for OOS during optimisation
Then I just wonder... If you're initially convinced that it's not worth doing, why did you write an advisor? I'm just perplexed)
I liked the design of the T.Z. =)
I advise to leave at least one month for OOS when optimising
Again, a question for the illiterate, what is OOS?