[WARNING CLOSED!] Any newbie question, so as not to clutter up the forum. Professionals, don't go by. Can't go anywhere without you. - page 772
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
In order to avoid further clarification. FoxUA create your own thread with a question in which you disclose all the intricacies. "Any newbie question..." is a topic for "quick" "Q&A".
In order to avoid any further clarifications. FoxUA, create your own thread with a question, where you disclose all the details. "Any newbie question..." is a topic for "quick questions and answers".
I'm not checking attitudes, I'm commenting on a statement I made to myself,
I'm not talking about quick, I'm talking about meaningless comments that don't help.
Andrey, you got confused, I looked at the code, your HaveBuyLimitOrderEnd variable occurs only in this construction:
And several posts above you write it in this one:
The whole point is that the first value works fine, but this one won't.
if(HaveBuyLimitOrderEnd== true)
{ModifyBuyStopOrder(PRAskS); // Check it
} }
How should it be?
Andrey, you got confused, I looked at the code, your HaveBuyLimitOrderEnd variable occurs only in this construction:
And several posts above you write it in this one:
Is this how it should be?
it is, here's the logical part, to put it face to face there blocks are procically the same difference in terms
so any block sounds the same "if the first variable is 1 and the second variable is 1,3,7 then open a pending order with the lot ____ and the price _____" and also if the flag of the selected open pending order is equal to the truth then modify (delete) this order
probably for(i=100;i>=0;i--), ?
Hello all, I was advised to simplify the Soviet, I started to simplify it, but I have a problem, the essence of the problem when you open orders in the journal writes error 4107 but it easily opens all orders, who can look at what the problem, I say at once all the code is taken from the library Kim Igor V. aka KimIV,
probably for(i=100;i>=0;i--), ?
Hello all, I was advised to simplify the Soviet, I started to simplify it, but I have a problem, the essence of the problem when you open orders in the journal writes error 4107 but it easily opens all orders, who can look at what the problem, I say at once all the code is taken from library Kim Igor V. aka KimIV,