[WARNING CLOSED!] Any newbie question, so as not to clutter up the forum. Professionals, don't go by. Can't go anywhere without you. - page 247

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
but it is advisable to check)
The discrepancy is due to the use of arrays without a shift.
Thank you very much. I figured out the trick through your link. Warning. Gentlemen the situation was that I used BUFFERS under iMAONArray(). And the buffers were initialized in init(). When I ran a visual test, the initial size of the Bars was small. And all arrays are initialized with small size !!! I increased the initialization size to 6000 elements minimum. And that was it! Visual testing of the EA confirmed that the calculation of the indicators was correct. Ha, that's a deal. Now it remains to test on the bar delay. I wonder if the values of the indicators will be different. But we will see on Monday. If anyone has any suggestions for saving operation time and not to make the arrays so large, but for the calculation to be shorter than half a year - feel free to express any ideas, because he who does nothing makes no mistakes.
Please add my case to some FAQ.
It's finally working!
New version of the function:
Thank you very much for your support. You can use the indicator any way you like. It's a little slow, though. :)))Seems to be working
>> It seems to be working.
Your version is faster than my new one. In EA it flies like that! :))) But I don't understand, if after the visual testing it is thrown on the chart again, the lines are not drawn. Can you suggest what might be the problem?Your version is faster than my new one. In EA it flies like that! :))) But I don't understand, if it is thrown on the chart again after visual testing, the lines are not drawn. Can you suggest what may be the problem?
I've already corrected it. The post above has been changed.
I've already corrected it. >> the post above has been changed.
Please re-post, something is not rendering for me again.Please re-post it, something is not rendering for me again.
There's a trick, when you just take it out on a chart it doesn't draw, but recompiling it helps it learn the numbers, i.e. we do start to see it.There's a trick, when you just pull it out on a chart it doesn't draw, but recompiling it helps it learn the numbers, i.e. we do start to see it.
I'll have another look tomorrow. It's late today. >> and I'm tired.