Looking for a specialist programmer - page 6

 
TheXpert писал (а) >>

Where are the rates coming from?

You're expensive.

20 quid, even euros, per man hour is very good. The more hours, the less, but not much.

America is another story, but it's easier to part with the money.

yeah - no arguments, i do !

but my income for 2008 was in the neighborhood of $10,000-$00.

i don't look like an exhausted dog with his tongue hanging out in the dust by the curb.

chasing after every passing car.

not often but I work

--

in a way, foreigners may be cranky but they pay well.

--

real-life rates.

--

a lot of orders just unfortunately I turn them down or send them to other guys on the forum

sometimes I do the work for nothing but less and less.


 

did a run with downloaded quotes, simulation quality =90%, mismatch error =2, result unchanged, so this parameter (simulation quality) is not that significant for the furnace)

 
YuraZ писал (а) >>

oooh - recommendation withdrawn !

screw it.

what do you mean? because i still don't understand many things by default, not in context, you recommended to play in the championship, now you don't recommend it?

 
YuraZ писал (а) >> that said, I don't look like an exhausted dog with his tongue out lying in the dust by the side of the road.
No, you don't, and rightly so. I've seen your picture in the Championship material.
 
blend писал (а) >>

what do you mean? because I still don't understand a lot of things by default, not in context, you recommended playing in the championship, now you don't recommend it?

Well --- of course you can try out for the championship!!! for luck

But on the real -- even on micro -- you don't want to bet that.

--

Quality is a more important parameter.

mismatch errors - although important, but not so dependent if there are few of them

---

to avoid errors load ALL history F2 from M1 to MN1 in QUALITY

there is even a video here (made by ROSH) on how to properly run the story

do not load last open day - it usually gives a mismatch

so just download until 17.09.2008 and leave the 18th if you want to download it today

or better yet, leave the last 2-3 months off

and after the annual - run these 3 months

and starting from any arbitrary points in these months

all points should not lead to a flush

 
YuraZ писал (а) >>

but on a real - even a micro - you shouldn't bet on it.

--

All points should not lead to a loss.

I'm not going to bet for real yet, but why don't you recommend it in this case?

I am not going to do it yet. But why do you recommend not to do it in this case?

i would like to know how experienced people look at the report and chart, what do they see immediately?

for example all the history i downloaded, i checked the same period from may till now, the results were the same with no simulation quality and with km =90%

the drawdown is 7000 in balance and not in funds

what could be confusing in this case, excluding the lack of testing at different time points?

 
TheXpert писал (а) >>

Where are the rates coming from?

You're expensive.

20 quid, even euros, per man hour is very good.

Everyone values themselves as much as they present themselves and as much as their clients are willing to pay. It's the market.

And that's IMHO okay.

 
blend писал (а) >>

I'm not going to bet on the real yet, but why don't you recommend it in this case?

Is it because you haven't tried it out on demo first or because of the peculiarities of the report and profit chart?

i would like to know how experienced people look at the report and chart, what do they see immediately?

for example all the history i downloaded, i checked the same period from may till now, the results are the same both with no simulation quality and with km =90%

the drawdown is 7000 in balance and not in funds

what could be confusing in this case, excluding the lack of testing at different time points?

Still try to send to the championship!

he will give you all the recommendations better than anyone else!

I could be wrong!

---

the equity growth curve is really worth a look!

 
blend писал (а) >>

I'm not going to bet on the real yet, but why don't you recommend it in this case?

Is it because you haven't tried it out on demo first or because of the peculiarities of the report and profit chart?

i would like to know how experienced people look at the report and chart, what do they see immediately?

for example all the history i downloaded, i checked the same period from may till now, the results were the same with no simulation quality and with km =90%

the drawdown is 7000 in balance and not in funds

what could be confusing in this case, excluding the lack of testing at different time points?

Even with step-by-step optimization with a lot of forwards, there is always, "by the law of meanness", a block/group of parameters which works great until the end of the story, but then loses everything on the real..... optimization is a tricky thing.... do a Forrum search, you'll find a lot of useful information....

 

Yesterday a stable advisor, which was evenly raising the balance on a tester forward, valiantly finished off the deposit in three days, without failing, according to all the rules.

Thanks for the demo...

Reason: