The concept of an ideal indicator - page 4

New comment
 
Korey писал (а) >>


The mental attitude of "looking for a prediction", which was formed during the first steps of getting to know the market, prevents you from using the whole arsenal of TA.

Psychological.

The goal of "looking for predictions" does not limit the possibilities of using the available tools, therefore it leads to the prospect of expanding the "arsenal" used.

 
D500_Rised писал (а) >>
Psychological.

Mental, as it's hard to get rid of.
 

Korey писал (а) >>

Mental, as it is difficult to get rid of.

Then it is called an illness, pathology etc. but not an attitude.

 
D500_Rised писал (а) >>

Then it is called disease, pathology, etc., but not installation.

It's a disease from advertising that attracts people to the market.

They should say honestly, as it is "1000 pips in 6 months = very good result", but no)))

 

For the sake of interest, I propose to list the parameters that should be taken into account by the indicator to better reflect the market. For example -

1. Average range of daily volatility.

2. The percentage of it at the current moment (as a percentage of the realization of the pattern). 3.

Current trading activity ( such as ATR *Volume).

4. Price speed or slope of the linear regression channel

5. The nearest support and resistance levels and their "strength".

6. Possible targets - where price is heading.

Who is bigger?

 
+percentage of previous wave)))
+situation on D1, W1. This is implied, but when you put a lot of indices, there is no more room for D1, W1.
+ working hours of stock exchanges and stat parameters to them.
 
+ output of the news release time on the chart as a possibility of a pullback or a spurt.
 
+Flat. It is in each of the above but needs to be highlighted technically.
+Indicator of risk/uncertainty, i.e. 'don't get involved will kill'.
 

Индикатор тренда это было бы хорошо, да еще бы давал доверительную вероятность продолжения, да стенки ставил, + внутренний период вычислял, + сильные уровни показывал, + текущую волатильность сравнивал

You're a realist, mate.

But seriously, strong levels would be nice. Probably it would be good if it combined the qualities of trend following and trend identification. And also multitiming, i.e. combination of signals from different timeframes and identification of smart entry points.

FlatTrader filter +1

 
I suggest that for the sake of interest you list the parameters that the indicator should take into account in order to better reflect the market. For example - >>1. Average daily volatility range. Implemented. And why daily? >>2. Percentage of it currently ( as percentage of pattern realised ) >>3. Current trading activity ( like ATR *Volume ) Decipher. >>3. >>4. Speed of price or slope of the linear regression channel Partially implemented. It's more difficult to find not the angle of slope of the channel, but the price on the border of the channel at a certain moment of time. >>5. Nearest support and resistance levels and their "strength". Implemented. >>6. Possible targets - where the price moves. Implemented (item 5, definition of levels and their strength.) >>7. Percentage of the previous wave))) The idea is interesting. Partially implemented by Fibo levels. >>8. Working hours of stock exchanges and stat parameters for them. What do you mean by the stat parameters? >>9. Displaying the news release time on the chart as an opportunity to rollback or spurt Implemented. >>10. Flat. It is in each of the above mentioned but it needs to be technically highlighted. It is partially implemented in item 5. >>11.Risk/uncertainty indicator, i.e. "don't get involved will kill". This, in fact, is the ideal indicator. >>Who's bigger? And really, who will give more characteristics of a perfect indicator?
123456789101112
New comment