Hidden divergence - page 39
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I have outlined a lot of new (not in the literature) material as a more than broad representation of the idea of an accurate trading system, designed for the prepared reader.
A trained trader can create his own accurate system based on these materials (there are even a dozen successful attempts).
I do not advertise or distribute the system, so most materials explaining the intricacies of the system are not available online. (including the main one, Secrets of Divergence).
But some crumbs appear in various posts.
And the "Divergence Wave" has little to do with the system and is on the web.
In order not to search for it, I attach.
Sergei, have you implemented an MTS according to your method?
Even if there is no MTS - just a TS
Is it possible to see the results of working with it, maybe there is a demo account for this TS?
stats will also be interesting, but much less so than the live score...
---
was, "Find yourself from above from Cosmos and stroke your favourite tea."
Correct, read correctly: "Find yourself from above from the pictures from Space and stroke yourself, your own favourite."
"Get in a pose, make a fist!"
Also well said by meta_trader about titanium balls with a diamond coating
---
on the internet, you often get a hostile reaction to the person you're talking to.
this is due to lack of additional sources of emotion - timbre of voice - facial expressions - you can't see the interlocutor's eyes
and people sometimes take quite innocuous language as an insult
For example, someone's making a joke and they don't get it
---
the main thing is not to be rude :-) - >> don't talk dirty to each other.
There was no sell signal on divergences yesterday - or rather there was one at the end of the move ;-) as far as the pound is concerned
Interesting you guys of course. On the chart I cited, the down signal on the pound yesterday went beautifully through all the frames inclusive from H4 to M1.
Before you write, at least take a look. Why exaggerate.
P.S. If you look at the attached chart, on the H4 you will see today's signal. Who had time to see it - already with a good profit.
There was a joke:
- Petyka, the device!
- 10!
- What about 10?
- What about the device?
Sergei, have you implemented an MTS according to your method?
Even if there is no MTS - just a TS
Can I see the results of it, maybe there are demo accounts for this TS?
If you have a demo account, it will be interesting, but much less than the live account...
No MTS on the system, and I don't intend to. I am not my own enemy.
I don't work on demo accounts. And I don't distribute the system.
I gave materials sufficient (not down to the minutiae) for independent construction of such a system.
I.e. the purpose is to provoke independent thinking in the reader, and not to sell him some system.
Interesting you guys, of course. On the chart I cited, the signal down on the pound yesterday went beautifully through all the frames inclusive from H4 to M1.
Before you write, at least take a look. Why exaggerate.
Show me WHERE your indicator gives the signal!
( you have a dash on M5 I see it, but the indicator does not give a signal - a dash apparently carried out by hand? )
i gave you a screenshot - on my M5 screenshots there is no signal for the sell
If you say that you need to look at all TFs!
how to look through the TF, how to make a decision, what is the true signal
a signal from M1 or a signal from M15 or M5 or the presence of these signals on all TFs at once - then in what time range as they are not evenly spaced
---
besides at 16 20 or so you have a buy signal... Going out? you do not have a dash there on the next one you have a dash - held
how to determine in real time and not on the figures in the history that the first buy is not the exit point?
this is by the way a very interesting point! by what criterion did you reject the signal at 1620 or thereabouts
---
I'm not talking about the trader's experience and analytics - I'm talking about how to formalize it for the machine.
I'm talking about automated entry - exit - here the formalization is needed more than abstract.
i did not even think about withdrawal at that point - i got out after about 50 pips. because i was looking at other pairs
although you yourself see the buy signal there - the machine is not a human, it will close the deal there
No MTS on the system, and I don't intend to. I'm not my own enemy.
I don't work on demo accounts. And I don't distribute the system.
I gave materials sufficient (not down to the minutiae) to build a similar system independently.
I.e. the purpose is to enable independent thinking of the reader, and not to push any system to him.
Thanks anyway for the information it is useful and of interest to many!
---
if the system is formalised, MTS is realistic!
Fear of automation speaks of uncertainty or vagueness - and additional criteria captured by the eye - experience, etc. - additional attributes that are not formalized for an automaton
---
I'd show you the stats given by the system that took 6th place in the championship 2007 ( for divergences )
but unfortunately I'm on holiday at the moment
When refining the system during the championship a few days after its start, the system gave 60k or second place!
there was just an unfortunate error! in the code
-------
However, here's https://championship.mql4.com/2007/ru/users/YuraZ/discussion/page2
the one that was finalized! after the start of the championship
--------
and here's her run in the championship stretch!
https://championship.mql4.com/2007/ru/users/YuraZ/discussion/page3
to YuraZ
if so, dc works better than neronka, - and what was the tf, what was the symbol?