Predicting the future with Fourier transforms - page 36
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The c2 conduit is redundant.
It's the little things.
Not just sparks, it even plays music, no batteries!
yeah...real, working circuit without all the bullshit...
you tune it to a cellular, radio or TV carrier...
...you put the battery in... charge it slowly and use it... all simple and efficient... when I was a kid, I used to do it for fun...
yeah...real, working circuit without all the bullshit...
you make several pieces... tune them to a cellular, radio or TV carrier...
you put the battery in... charge it slowly and use it... it's simple and efficient... I used to do it when I was a kid...
Yeah. Only that guy in the American video charges a battery of several 1000 Ah battery packs in 5 minutes with a palm-sized battery.
Yeah. Only that guy in the American video charges a battery with a palm-sized battery for a few 1000 Ah in 5 minutes.
I'm not against the power of the ether...but sending a message to read whatever...not so much...the above scheme really works...yes - very little power...but it's real...
The measurements are not clear either....you need proper instruments and not just Chinese testers....who knows what frequency boundary they operate at...
Testing should be done in the field ... or in a shielded box (to avoid interference) ... if the flat garage or wherever the experiments are conducted ... not clean ... go crosstalk from the wiring ...
about video )))) well, the hell are not children ... show a lot of things you can ... but the real facts are not seen on this forum ( I have not read the others because I do not need to)
Just for fun ... the actual schematic diagram ... with full specifications up to parameters of iron, ferrite transceivers, chokes, etc ... let's order parts and soldering irons... let's solder... Remember our youth...
So he says the diagrams are free on his website. You can replicate it.
By the way, Dynatron's circuit is not much different in principle from Tesla's patented one. There are now new semiconductors that can switch more efficiently than Tesla's circuit. That's all there is to it.
So he says the diagrams are free on his website. You can replicate it.
By the way, Dynatron's circuit is not much different in principle from Tesla's patented one. There are now new semiconductors that can switch more efficiently than Tesla's circuit. That's all.
Nothing has been invented faster than tubes in terms of speed... and the mosfets (poles) are still far behind them (if you consider the high voltage of tubes)...
Here's a schematic ( I googled it ) about like this I built when I was young...just recalculate the circuit for your conditions...
who wants to play around ))))
So he says the diagrams are free on his website. We can do it again.
We don't really believe in it... and we don't need power... just for fun...
If you build it yourself and make real measurements... then post it...
The radio operators are reeling over and over again.
Never mind the miracle of the detector radio. I used to build one myself when I was the right age. But here's the thing: even then I could understand my grandfather's explanation of why it worked. My grandfather was a self-taught radio operator, he had walked across the river seven times during the war, and in the 60s he loved assembling television sets at home.
Now - we'll sort out the energy, if we can. Almost 100 % of radio operators are sincerely convinced that the aerial is the amplifier of a signal, based on the indisputable fact: the aerial increases a parity "Signal/noise". Do all idea providers share this idea?