Predicting the future with Fourier transforms - page 29

New comment
 
Trololo:

so the trail of the rest stop is lost.

He has not lost track of anything. He has clearly laid out his ideas of trade here, on this forum. It was simply written in the language of a radar manual: those who are in the know will understand, and those who aren't - study the materials. I don't know if his threads are worn out or not, but as far as I remember everything was described there - the idea, the model, and even what a week's earnings were worth.
 
tara:

True

Prival guessed that forex is not his vocation, asked him to be banned so there was no desire to litter people's brains with nonsense and became a Shaolin monk.
 
TheXpert:
I don't believe it :) (с)
I said emulates but does not implement...
 
jelizavettka:

Prival guessed that forex was not his vocation, asked him to be banned so he wouldn't want to contaminate people's brains with nonsense and became a Shaolin monk.

Has Trololo gone the same way?
 

Seven pages written in a day and nothing to read. I'll give you something to think about.

Trololo:


Why should I judge the future? I would at least like to know the state of the present movement.

The present is a point on the axis of time. There is and cannot be any movement in the present. You need time to move. This is something fans of Range and Renko bars and other perversions of time should think about.

Trololo:

a rocket of say 100kg mass flying at 200km/hr cannot turn 180 degrees in an instant and fly on. such a turn will take some time (which in this problem is solvable to calculate), but the market is different.


It can. If it collides with something. For example, with an oncoming rocket with mass of 1000 kg flying at a speed of 2000 km/hour. At the market, the same thing happens. There must be a reason for an unexpected reversal. If there is no reason, the price will follow the forecast. The reason can go one way or the other with equal probability (if the forecast is calculated correctly and does not itself shift those probabilities).

 

In short, in the first case, the phase change line (sign change for half-periods) of the 2 sinusoids is the same, and in the 2nd case, it is not. So, as a result of adding these sinusoids, this line will eventually remain in place for the first case, while in the 2nd case it will change dramatically to become the "average" line.

 
tara:

Has Trololo gone the same way?
A good way to develop the mind and body.
 
forte928:
I said emulates but doesn't implement...

And I'm not you...

jelizavettka:

It's a good way to develop your mind and body.

better to go snowboarding :)

 
jelizavettka: He has also been a member of the Shaholin Monk Association and has been a member of the Shaholin Monk Association of the United States of America.
Nevertheless, he recently appeared on the forum and showed his entry up on USDCHF on the day of the intervention, when it passed 9 or 10 figures. The entry is very accurate. And the indicator there, if I am not mistaken, was suspiciously similar to Kalman.
 
Svinotavr:
Wouldn't it be better then to follow the paths of those people who have definitely succeeded?

You see, Dima, who these people are - successful people, and proof (real) of their success, but that's not the main thing, but the question is why would these successful people leave threads in their path. which you suggest to follow. your path is easier.
1...222324252627282930313233343536...55
New comment