acceptable rudeness! :)) - page 3

New comment
 
I have tested it with quotes from NS with constant 1 lot, when I connect MM the account goes to billions, which is not serious)). The result was much worse than broker's data, I even had to decrease take to 14. But if we consider that it's not a problem to take them down to 6 pips, then it's OK. Matemat, the 5% drawdown did not work out - sorry)) The image does not stand up, damn it
Alpari-Demo (Build 213)

Symbol EURGBP (Euro vs Great Britain Pound)
Period 5 Minutes (M5) 1999.01.05 08:05 - 2008.03.24 07:35
Model All ticks (most accurate method based on all smallest available timeframes)
Parameters SL=18; TP=14; MM=false; Risk=100; ManLot=1; Slippage=1; Magic=7895123;
Bars in history 663415 Modelled ticks 10176833 Simulation quality 89.99%
Chart mismatch errors 2
Initial deposit 3000.00
Net profit 737612.74 Total profit 3352521.57 Total loss -2614908.83
Profitability 1.28 Expectation of winning 37.89
Absolute drawdown 2559.02 Maximum drawdown 88966.80 (12.58%) Relative drawdown 87.07% (2968.68)
Total trades 19467 Short positions (% win) 10170 (60.99%) Long positions (% win) 9297 (63.97%)
Profitable trades (% of all) 12150 (62.41%) Loss trades (% of all) 7317 (37.59%)
Largest profitable trade 288.15 losing deal -390.23
Average profitable deal 275.93 losing trade -357.37
Maximum number continuous wins (profit) 110 (30721.64) Continuous losses (loss) 63 (-22329.47)
Maximum Continuous Profit (number of wins) 30721.64 (110) Continuous loss (number of losses) -22329.47 (63)
Average continuous winnings 5 continuous loss 3



 
Initial deposit 3000.00
Absolute drawdown 2559.02 Maximum drawdown 88966.80 (12.58%) Relative drawdown 87.07% (2968.68)
==========================================================================================

??? And that's with a fixed lot of 1? Margene is sitting on a stake, and it's a stake. That's repeatedly guaranteed to be a bust.
I suppose there is already some clarity with the 2008 championship - delyus will definitely not win.
 

Yeah, right, timbo.

delyus, I have a few questions:

1. what if a relative drawdown of almost 3000 would have happened from the initial depo and not from a slightly larger one?

2. playing with lot 1, or what? Then with a m.o. of 37.89, the m.o. of the trade in pips is less than 4 pips. It is unstable because the m.o. of the trade is too small. Reliability - as in pips.

3. maximal drawdown - 89000. With 1 lot, it is 8900 pips - no stops! Why are you messing with my head then? Stick to the picture, do not lie, all gif are the same.

 

I uploaded this to the livery channel, it's not uploading here

http://ljplus.ru/images/?id=4920003

 
timbo:
Initial deposit
3000.00
Absolute drawdown2559.02Maximum drawdown88966.80 (12.58%)Relative drawdown87.07% (2968.68)


==========================================================================================



??? And that's with a fixed lot of 1? Margene's a stake and a stake. It's a repeated guaranteed flush.

I guess there is already some clarity with the 2008 championship - delyus will definitely not win.
I agree with Mathemat that there is something wrong here. If you have a stop loss of 18 pips, then how come you have a drawdown?
for a 3,000 lot initial deposit you have to put 1 lot, the risk is more than 30% in a deal, if you put a 3,000 lot then put 0.3 lot, the risk is 10%,
I wouldn't mind if you did the test, so just put a loss of 18, profit 10 and change the lot to 0.3, I think you'll get the report. I will wait for the report.
This EA is interesting, I think it simply needs to be run properly in optimization at normal risks,
I'm sure even at low risk per trade the profit will be good, you have enough delyus, look at the chart for the drawdown, if the stop should be 18
 

I don't know why I can't insert a picture here! Here it is with the tee 12. The picture shows a 45 degree angle. Alpari terminal is glitchy, so it only works with 1 lot, can't adjust risk in any way. Matemat, max drawdown 2.90% That good? But why the relative 87% I don't understand what's wrong. In State it seems to catch SL18 without errors. Maybe it is a glitch.




The symbol

 EURGBP (Euro vs Great Britain Pound)
Period 5 Minutes (M5) 1999.01.05 08:05 - 2008.03.24 09:25
Model All ticks (most accurate method based on all smallest available timeframes)
Parameters SL=18; TP=12; MM=false; Risk=100; ManLot=1; Slippage=1; Magic=7895123;
Bars in history 663437 Ticks simulated 10177021 Modeling quality 89.99%
Chart mismatch errors 0
Initial deposit 3000.00
Net profit 1102565.99 Total profit 2866296.72 Total loss -1763730.73
Profitability 1.63 Expected payoff 56.62
Absolute drawdown 2558.84 Maximum drawdown 29231.19 (2.90%) Relative drawdown 87.06% (2968.49)
Total trades 19474 Short positions (% win) 10177 (74.16%) Long positions (% win) 9297 (75.16%)
Profitable trades (% of all) 14535 (74.64%) Profitable trades (% of all) 4939 (25.36%)
Largest profitable trade 206.21 losing deal -381.69
Average profitable deal 197.20 losing trade -357.10
Maximum continuous wins (profit) 137 (27364.12) Continuous losses (loss) 32 (-11368.58)
Maximum continuous profits (number of wins) 27364.12 (137) Continuous loss (number of losses) -11368.58 (32)
Average continuous winnings 9 continuous loss 3
 
I have been trying to get rid of cracks in molten sex, I have been trying to get rid of them. You have to use a lot of risk, you may see that the drawdown is 30 percent or something like that.
 
A maximum drawdown of 29 tonnes on a 3k deposit when testing with a fixed lot and no reinvestment is a complete ass.
Try to understand the simple thing that this drawdown can happen at any time, even on the very first trade. I.e. that 2.9% is much worse than 87%, because you'll still owe a lot there.
 

Here it is

Bars in history 663442
Simulated ticks 10177081
Simulation quality 89.99%
Chart mismatch errors 0
Initial deposit 10000.00
Net profit 948703.25
Total profit 3151230.44
Total loss -2202527.19
Profitability 1.43
Win expectation 48.73
Absolute drawdown 2819.23
Maximum drawdown 47583.08 (5.45%)
Relative drawdown 31.02% (3229.35)
Total trades 19469
Short positions (% win) 10172 (67.33%)
Long positions (% win) 9297 (69.48%)
Profitable trades (% of all) 13309 (68.36%)
Losing trades (% of all) 6160 (31.64%)
Largest
profitable trade 246.08
losing trade -390.63
Average
profitable trade 236.77
losing trade -357.55
Maximum
continuous wins (profit) 112 (26870.94)
continuous losses (loss) 53 (-18806.34)
Maximum
continuous gains (number of wins) 26870.94 (112)
continuous losses (number of losses) -18806.34 (53)
Average
continuous gains 7
continuous losses 3

 
I told him again to lower the risk, the profit will be great but the risk is small, you do not understand, set a 5 or 10 maximum risk per transaction, then you'll see that the drawdown will be small. I have to use it for demo and use it for a month. As I said 30 percent drawdown, I have already done it.
1234567
New comment
Reason: