You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
According to VTE it turns out that each chart has its own life, sort of without any logical connection to the charts of other instruments.
Of course, crosses can give extra confidence, that much is clear. If X/Y * Y/Z = X/Z and there are recognizable waves (better impulses) on the instruments on the left side of the ratio, then you can figure out what would be on the instrument on the right side if there is any doubt.
Two unidirectional zigzags on the left may well make an impulse on the right - whatever EWP theorists say about the different nature of impulse relative to corrections. And two multi-directional pulses on the left would make some kind of complex correction on the right...
According to VTE, it turns out that each chart has a life of its own, sort of even without any logical connection to the charts for the other instruments.
I have never managed to register more than two waves directed to the same direction. I do not know why.
As for the presence of mutual influence, I'm not objecting - of course it must be present. But I do not know how to calculate this influence and use it in trading.
Of course, crosses can give extra confidence, that much is clear. If X/Y * Y/Z = X/Z and there are recognizable waves (better impulses) on the instruments on the left side of the ratio, then you can figure out what would be on the instrument on the right side if there is any doubt.
Two unidirectional zigzags on the left may well make an impulse on the right - whatever EWP theorists say about the different nature of impulse relative to corrections. And two differently directed pulses on the left could make some kind of complex correction on the right...
Continuing the conversation...
And the two multidirectional pulses on the left are some kind of complex correction on the right...
What if we calculate something like this logic: several consecutive crosses, use them to calculate the probability of price evolution (well, as a ball of wagons) and try to forecast the movement of the target instrument from this result. There is an assumption that the accuracy of the forecast may increase.
By the way, while I was writing the canadian bounced from 1.0020 to 1.0113 in a normal way... Just at the level of my indicator :-) which is nice.
Well, joke's a joke, but I did find time to review Spearman and Pearson. As perceptions change over time, so do the methods of application.
Well, joke's a joke, but I did find time to review Spearman and Pearson. With time perception changes, so do the methods of application.
On the subject of time and variability of perception, that's 100% true.