Valmars - page 5
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Clearly
1) none worked
delete at the end of the day at 00:00
2) 1 has triggered and remains open
moves until it closes (no other order should close until the triggered one closes)
3) one order has triggered and closed at stop loss or take profit
the other order is waiting for the closing in the same way as in Dakendl2 (by the way, the Artem11 version deletes the other one when one order triggers, that is why the profit from 3 lots in 7 years is less than 150 000, not 254 000).
If one triggered and the price went in the other direction, and reached the second it will also trigger, otherwise why does he need it at all? and it should be removed when the first triggered.
The idea is that it is not triggered, and it is triggered only when the first one reaches the stop loss, because it may turn out to be optimal to place a far stop loss, and the order should optimally be close to the price. If they both trigger, everything may end up in a common minus - one will take a far stop loss and the other one will take a very small trailing stop. Switch 2Order true/false, you put a hold, 2 orders are triggered, fouls 1 order.
another couple of questions:
why is it considered that "all ticks" in the tester do not coincide with the demo, while the demo does not coincide with the real? because mt4 developers guarantee that the tester is flawless, while brokers guarantee that the demo matches the real. what does slippage=0 (no slippage?) and why is it assumed that in an EA it helps to fight the brokerage tricks? you said that the minifX quotes are given by a robot, but in the major forex, who gives them, a human operator?
claud666.
I don't understand about the pound, be more specific
claud666.
I don't understand about the pound, be more specific
Look at the pound's behaviour today: a stop loss would have worked!!!!
claud,
1) on long periods mathematically gives profits, not one day,
2) optimised for Eurobucks and not the Pound
3) Works on any instrument, including stocks, indices, etc., but it is gepiste and more twitchy there, you need to increase stops, takei and trailing.
It is not a grail, it is an Expert Advisor))
claud,
1) on long periods mathematically gives profits, not one day,
2) optimised for Eurobucks and not the Pound
3) It works with any instrument, including stocks, indices, etc., but it is gepiste and more twitchy there, you need to increase stops, takei, trailing.
This is not a grail, it's an Expert Advisor))
Try it out on a demo - you'll see what I mean!
claud,
Right now it looks like this: an order placed on high, trailing order does not have enough room for profit, it sharply gives back, triggers a stop loss, goes back to high and successfully overcomes it, but without us and we are catching a loss, even though we were right. If we had this EA at least in 2006, we would have made a fortune, but so far we are biting our elbows, luckily not the first one))