Is the tester working correctly ? - page 2

New comment
 
A widespread error. It is particularly nasty, because it opens many orders. The point is that usually on the next tick (which has not opened a new bar), the conditions for opening a new order triggered again. And your EA does not know that it has just opened an order again. We need to set a flag or something like a new order has just been opened and it cannot be opened again.
 
Oh,no,that's not what this is about..... I check if order was opened before opening
if(OrdersTotal()==0) if it was, the expert won't try again... :))
 
It looks like your eXpert opens an order on one tick, closes it on the next tick and opens it again. See if there is a case where both the open and close conditions are met.
 
Try going through all the tics and following the eye movements, you'll find the answer.
I had that too - observation helped.
 
Renat писал (а):
Everything looks very similar that bar opening testing is being used.

Make sure all timeframes are downloaded, "Recalculate" is ticked and check again please.
Also, what are the orders with the green arrows? Please give their exact parameters.



Here is a very clear example

Here is the tester report :



here is a list of trades

1 2006.08.10 00:07 buy 1.00 1.9045 1.9015 2. 0045 0. 00 10000. 00
2 2006.08.10 00:49 close 1.00 1.9048 1.9015 2. 0045 30. 01 10030. 01
3 2006.08.10 01:04 buy 2 1.00 1.9053 1.9023 2. 0053 0. 00 10030. 01
4 2006.08.10 01:35 close 2 1.00 1.9059 1.9023 2. 0053 60. 00 10090. 01
5 2006.08.10 01:52 buy 3 1.00 1.9053 1.9023 2. 0053 0. 00 10090. 01
6 2006.08.10 03:26 close 3 1.00 1.9059 1.9023 2. 0053 60. 00 10150. 01
7 2006.08.10 07:21 close 4 1.00 1.9055 1.9025 2. 0055 0. 00 10150. 01
8 2006.08.10 07:56 s/l 4 1.00 1.9025 1.9025 2. 0055 -300. 00 9850. 01
9 2006.08.10 07:56 s/l 5 1.00 1.9027 1.8997 2. 0027 0. 00 9850. 01
10 2006.08.10 08:12 close 5 1.00 1.9052 1.8997 2. 0027 250. 00 10100. 01
11 2006.08.10 09:24 close 6 1.00 1.9055 1.9025 2. 0055 0. 00 10100. 01
12 2006.08.10 09:25 s/l 6 1.00 1.9025 1.9025 2. 0055 -300. 00 9800. 01
13 2006.08.10 09:25 s/l 7 1.00 1.9027 1.8997 2. 0027 0. 00 9800. 01
14 2006.08.10 10:09 s/l 7 1.00 1.8997 1.8997 2. 0027 -300. 00 9500. 01
15 2006.08.10 10:09 s/l 8 1.00 1.8998 1.8968 1. 9998 0. 00 9500. 01
16 2006.08.10 10:28 close 8 1.00 1.9041 1.8968 1. 9998 430. 00 9930. 01
17 2006.08.10 10:28 sell 9 1.00 1.9041 1.9071 1. 8041 0. 00 9930. 01
18 2006.08.10 10:28 close 9 1.00 1.9015 1.9071 1. 8041 260. 00 10190. 01
19 2006.08.10 11:09 sell 10 1.00 1.9039 1.9069 1. 8039 0. 00 10190. 01
20 2006.08.10 11:09 close 10 1.00 1.9031 1.9069 1. 8039 80. 00 10270. 01
21 2006.08.10 11:22 sell 11 1.00 1.9037 1.9067 1. 8037 0. 00 10270. 01
22 2006.08.10 11:54 close 11 1.00 1.9031 1.9067 1. 8037 60. 00 10330. 01
23 2006.08.10 13:35 sell 12 1.00 1.9037 1.9067 1. 8037 0. 00 10330. 01
24 2006.08.10 13:42 close 12 1.00 1.9032 1.9067 1. 8037 50. 00 10380. 01
25 2006.08.10 13:47 sell 13 1.00 1.9038 1.9068 1. 8038 0. 00 10380. 01
26 2006.08.10 13:50 close 13 1.00 1.9032 1.9068 1. 8038 60. 00 10440. 01
27 2006.08.10 14:05 sell 14 1.00 1.9037 1.9067 1. 8037 0. 00 10440. 01
28 2006.08.10 14:31 s/l 14 1.00 1.9067 1.9067 1. 8037 -300. 00 10140. 01
29 2006.08.10 14:31 s/l 15 1.00 1.9066 1.9096 1. 8066 0. 00 10140. 01
30 2006.08.10 14:32 close 15 1.00 1.9032 1.9096 1. 8066 340. 00 10480. 01
31 2006.08.10 14:32 close 16 1.00 1.9042 1.9072 1. 8042 0. 00 10480. 01
32 2006.08.10 14:33 close 16 1.00 1.9030 1.9072 1. 8042 120. 00 10600. 01
33 2006.08.10 16:16 sell 17 1.00 1.9045 1.9075 1. 8045 0. 00 10600. 01
34 2006.08.10 16:16 close 17 1.00 1.8975 1.9075 1. 8045 700. 00 11300. 01
35 2006.08.10 16:16 sell 18 1.00 1.9031 1.9061 1. 8031 0. 00 11300. 01
36 2006.08.10 16:16 close 18 1.00 1.8973 1.9061 1. 8031 580. 00 11880. 01
37 2006.08.10 16:16:16 sell 19 1.00 1.9088 1.9118 1. 8088 0. 00 11880. 01
38 2006.08.10 16:16 close 19 1.00 1.8940 1.9118 1. 8088 1480. 00 13360. 01


it means that the system calculates that the price went down in one minute by 140 pips ...

really waiting for an answer.... all testing has come to a standstill :(
 
Itso:
It looks like your eXpert opens an order on one tick, closes it on the next tick and opens it again. See if there is a case where both the open and close conditions are met.

And even if it did... still how can she do that.... the next example she catches profits on ticks at 140 p
 
victors писал (а):
Try going through all the tics and following the eye movements, I think you'll find the answer.
I had that too - observation helped.

hello dear :)))

I'll try... but not much hope...
 
nchnch писал (а):
victors wrote (a):
try going through all the tics and following the eye movements I think you'll find the answer
I had that too - observation helped

hello dear :)))

I will try... but not much hope...

pause after the transaction :)
 
Any questions - answer all of them please:
  1. Where did you get the graphs from?
  2. Did you do an external import?
  3. What is happening on other timeframes of this symbol?
  4. Have you checked with your eyes and synchronized other timeframes of this symbol from your trading server?
  5. Did you tick the "Recalculate" box when testing?
  6. Have you tested it on М1 or did you just switch to М1 after the test on another timeframe to see it better?
Looks like using a cached (or self cooked) tick history in the FXT file that the test is running on, and then displaying the test results on a normal M1 chart.
 
Renat писал (а):
Any questions - answer all of them, please:
  1. Where did you get the graphs from?
    1. Did you do an external import?
    2. What is happening on other timeframes of this symbol?
    3. Have you checked with your eyes and synchronized other timeframes of this symbol from your trading server?
    4. Did you tick the "Recalculate" box when testing?



I got the charts from Alpari.
I downloaded them and put them in my history folder.
Everywhere except the daily charts the trades are hanging over the chart.
i've tried to use the same forex robot as i did on my real account. i've also tried the same forex robot on my real account. i got the same results.

Checked it myself :))

1234567
New comment
Reason: