You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
What does this have to do with the user agreement? It says that the user, i.e. the programmer, undertakes not to modify the terminal.
Do you understand at all what we are talking about? Let me explain - who compiles the versions of the terminal for different DCs.
Excuse me, but isn't"user, i.e. programmer" a misnomer?
For example, I am not programmer. But a user, or more specifically a trader.
Excuse me, but isn't"user, i.e. programmer" a misnomer?
For example, I am not a programmer. But a user, well, or more specifically a trader.
Of course it is)) I'm talking about me in a hurry ))
Thanks, and (sorry for being boring) I will also try to return to the TC's post, who complained that the order opened in the other direction (instead of SELL it opened BUY and vice versa) . Because he probably is not quite a programmer either. Is it OK that I'm like this?
It's strange, why hasn't anyone answered? It's an interesting question, I too have brokers who are stalling on EAs, they won't let me trade them.
If the order is opened by an EA or a script, you can usually set a "magic number" for it. This is a number used by the Expert Advisor to distinguish its positions from those opened by someone else. The "magic number" cannot be set manually when opening an order. The conclusion is that if the terminal does not send to the server any distinctive sign when opening an order, by whom the EA opened the position or not, then if "magic number" is not specified, then it is impossible to find out who has sent the order to open the position - EA or trader. However, if you use several Expert Advisors in your work or if you work manually as well. If you do not specify "magik", then EAs will confuse their orders with other EAs' orders.
Also, in the detailed report it still says who set the order, Expert Advisor or hand
Also, the itemised report still says who set the order, the expert or the hand
and then there is no way to hide the information about who opened the position from the broker
What do you mean, you can't hide it? Does this mean that there are some rules in trading that force to hide the use of EAs, bots, scripts, and other developments included in the concept of "Forex Experts, Trading Robots and Expert Advisors"?
Of course YES. For example, there are contests for manual trading, there are brokers providing a certain amount of money for trading with the condition that trading will be manual only.