FOREX - Trends, Forecasts and Implications 2015(continued) - page 1943

New comment
 
Alexey Busygin:

Who will give you this data? Don't make fun, they have trillion-dollar turnovers that are not recorded. If you put these volumes on the net, markets will go crazy, leaps of thousands of points up, down.

So, do not talk nonsense if you do not know how it all works. And how it works, this pyramid scheme.

Lesh, you won't get any, go and smoke).

Or read something, though I don't think it will help you, you're Alesha)))

https://www.newyorkfed.org/data-and-statistics/index.html

https://www.newyorkfed.org/data-and-statistics/data-visualization/index.html

 
Vadens:

Do not argue with the patriarch in vain. He has been working here for years for a reason, he has tried many things (there are lots of witnesses, including me). You better tell us how the pyramid is organized. Do not sit on your knowledge, share it. Some may argue with your knowledge, others may laugh, do not take it to heart, it is your knowledge and I respect it.

Che Guevara is of the opinion that forex quotes are written by a robot.

It is controversial in my opinion, but it is an opinion.
This is just an excuse for suckers, including themselves, why they cannot earn. They are looking for conspiracies.
 
Nestradamus:

Well, well )))) Blessed is he who believes.

On our charts, the abscissa axis is time and the ordinate axis is price. They have different dimensionalities and you use Pythagoras' theorem...

Don't pretend you don't know - Gunn was artificially equating them.
 
denniss:

Derivative, but there is no access to spot trades, much less dark pools and other exotics, so I don't see the point of shaking the air with those clever words.

The cluster was referring to this one.

clusterdelta.com.

What candles have to do with it I don't know.

Neither do I.

Well, how? The clusters there are built on a certain standard candlestick pattern, set in the terminal and selected by you when you click it. The beginning and the end of the count are tied to the terminal (read astronomical) time and have nothing to do with the real time flow, set by the ticks of the instrument itself. Remember, I wrote, there is an event - time flows, there is no event - time is constant, as we fix its change relative to the previous change. The event in this case is a tick. That's what I see as the artificiality of terminal time slicing.

And if you set time moments at ticks they won't coincide with a terminal time slice.

Then we exclude the time moments that lie between extrema. This way we aggregate the data between extrema. And then it appears that the clusters should be built on the period defined by the extrema. And further movement should be compared to the movement within this "extreme" range. And then you will see the price reaction to the previous movement within this range. When the price moves out of this range, you will switch to an upper scale. This will be correct.

Going the way imposed by the terminal time you are taking different pieces from different extreme ranges and the data gets distorted. You expect one reaction, you end up with a different one and start looking for the reasons. And they are on the surface.

All this means that the period, on which you analyze data, should be selected correctly, so that the data is stationary, and not a single pip "drops out" of the model. And then it will have a repeatability, read predictability. And what data to fill the range with is a matter for the next stage of analysis.

 
vng_nemo:

And I'm the same.

What do you mean by what? The clusters there are based on a certain standard candlestick pattern, set in the terminal and chosen by you when you click it. The beginning and the end of the count are tied to the terminal (read astronomical) time and have nothing to do with the real time flow, set by the ticks of the instrument itself. Remember, I wrote, there is an event - time flows, there is no event - time is constant, as we fix its change relative to the previous change. The event in this case is a tick. That's what I see as the artificiality of terminal time slicing.

And if you set time moments at ticks they won't coincide with a terminal time slice.

Then we exclude the time moments that lie between extrema. This way we aggregate the data between extrema. And then it appears that the clusters should be built on the period defined by the extrema. And further movement should be compared to the movement within this "extreme" range. And then you will see the price reaction to the previous movement within this range. When the price moves out of this range, you will switch to an upper scale. This will be correct.

Going the way imposed by the terminal time you are taking different pieces from different extreme ranges and the data gets distorted. You expect one reaction, you end up with a different one and start looking for the reasons. And they are on the surface.

All this means that the period, on which you analyze data, should be selected correctly, so that the data is stationary, and not a single pip "drops out" of the model. And then it will have a repeatability, read predictability. And what data to fill the range with is the matter of the next stage of analysis.

But there are several ways to "break" the data from the time, and in general I don't see any meaning in these clusters for currency trading.

In general I don't see any sense in these clusters for currency trading in particular, zero.

Because, as I told many times, I've never met, or even heard of a stably successful intraday trader on currencies.

In my report, which showed in summer, stable growth and drawdowns on intraday, so why do I need the hassle.

So with clusters it's not up to me.

 
denniss:

Lesh, you won't get any, go and smoke).

Or read something, though I don't think it will help you, you're Alesha)))

https://www.newyorkfed.org/data-and-statistics/index.html

https://www.newyorkfed.org/data-and-statistics/data-visualization/index.html

Since when did you become so enlightened? Have you learned your ABCs?
 
Alexey Busygin:
Since when did you start educating yourselves? Have you learned your ABCs?
Lyosha, don't strain your brain, which you don't have, smoke)
 
denniss:

Lesh, you won't get any, go and smoke).

Or read something, though I don't think it will help you, you're Alesha)))

https://www.newyorkfed.org/data-and-statistics/index.html

https://www.newyorkfed.org/data-and-statistics/data-visualization/index.html

Vasya, you'd better tell us, show us how you trade! Is there any result, any conversion of knowledge into money or not?

Or are you just good for nothing?

If you smoke, smoke quietly, and your own!

 
Alexey Busygin:

Vasya, you'd better tell us, show us how you trade! Is there any result, any conversion of knowledge into money or not?

Or are you only able to cheer?

If you smoke, smoke quietly and your own!

Lesha, have you shown me, or do you want to see me every day?)

Are you offended again, Lech3%?)))

1...193619371938193919401941194219431944194519461947194819491950...1996
New comment