FOREX - Trends, Forecasts and Implications 2015(continued) - page 1360

New comment
 

And these are your options going forward, but if the first 90% are only options


 
Thank you stranger.
 
forget it. now gaps from the opening and won't cover for a long, long time
 
stranger:

Can you see on the euro where how much of what has been traded?

Here's a logical move for Monday


Stranger:

And these are your options for further developments, but if the first 90%, these are only options


Clever. I know what kind of work has been done.

......... I, in the presence of laziness and for lack of intelligence, have made it simple - so far it works.

 
I told you, the main target is 0.85. You thought you could get a hold of it? Looks like nowhere. Old one, stop milking the old titties, we've got a terrorist attack on our hands.
 
stranger:

Can you see on the euro where how much of what was traded?

So much for the logical move on Monday.


I don't see the logic. The crimson level of maximum "trading" is bouncing up and down the price haphazardly, in my opinion.

Where did the levels from Friday 6-11 go? Didn't fit the pattern? But it was a strong move, so we should have caught it.

It's like a chamomile...

 
About six years ago, a guy told me that you can trade if you use one or two indicators. Like he said. Whenever I try to fill a chart with new ideas, I go back to two indices. I've already written ... You may do without any indices but then you'll have to draw everything with your own hands. Who from D1 - no problem, and who "chases hares", then........
 
Vadens:

I see your point. Let it be so. But the problem of worthwhile, working information in the means of communication remains. Draghi, Carney, FedExpress......... in their speeches about the reaction of these 225000(?) do not think about vanity until H4, at best they are worried about the reaction of D1 or even higher (because on each TF in the terminal there are participants of the online financial system, which influence the zig-zag.)
I do not want to work from D1, I am interested in the short term, respectively, I have to focus on the information and the reaction of the above 225000(?) ....... and here I have become more comfortable "closed" only in the chart.

I don't understand the predilection for any timeframe. A river is still a river whether you look at it from the shore, from a bird's eye view, or from space. You just can't see as much detail from space as you can from the shore, and vice versa.

I consider the information, which we are "kindly" provided with as if to facilitate our labours, to be bait and deceit. The only thing worth doing is classical FA. But there is not enough education on this subject... and I'm too old to learn... I have to use good old-fashioned mathematics and programming.

 
fa cannot be used. because it is a) infinite and b) highly subjective.
 
Nestradamus:

I don't see the logic. The crimson level of the maximum "trade" is bouncing up and down the price haphazardly, in my opinion.

Where did the levels from Friday 6-11 go? Didn't fit the pattern? But it was a strong move, so we should have caught it.

It's like a chamomile...

Well, on Thursday it was 130 up, below 07 said - take it, no one wanted it, why is Friday's 90 down better?
1...135313541355135613571358135913601361136213631364136513661367...1996
New comment