
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It is not correct to focus on the rating and accordingly introduce gradations of "quality" of a member of the mql5.community, as the rating reflects the user's overall activity on the site.
A more experienced programmer with a rating of over 20,000 can edit the code to make it correct or simply give the code a rating of, say, 3 out of 10, or perhaps offer his or her own option.
It is not correct to focus on the rating and accordingly introduce gradations of "quality" of a member of the mql5.community, as the rating reflects the user's overall activity on the site.
Unfortunately, the chances are absolutely zero - proven by a bunch of dead projects that hoped for "the community will do everything itself".
Such things are created solely for money(directly or covertly), under competent management and control. Look at the MQL5 documentation section - years of work by many authors and translators have been invested there.
I could argue with that,
What did the social media organisers do? Nothing... They didn't add people, they didn't create groups, they didn't add content, even the applications were created by other people.
All they did was make a user-friendly web interface, everything else was brought in by the people themselves and the people themselves developed the social networking communities.
The projects where the administration imposed their conditions and didn't care about the quality of the new content failed.
The community feed is regularly updated with information like "we are 560 000", maybe it's time to move on to the quality?
You have two mistakes:
You have two mistakes:
I agree - energy needs to be channelled in the right direction.
Otherwise, it will take considerably more of it to achieve the goal. The result will be an outburst from the bubbling masses, and its utility is initially undefined.
You have two mistakes:
It might make sense to make some kind of tutorial pages offering different code options.
What's wrong with Codabase + Articles?
Writing a decent tutorial is very complicated and expensive - not everyone is able to do it.
What's wrong with Codabase + Articles?
Writing a decent textbook is very difficult and expensive - not everyone of the "chosen" can do it.
Dear Renat, I am thinking of writing a book based on the https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/58256 branch. I wonder if the company could sponsor it on mutually beneficial terms. There are other offers for the company as well. Thank you.
We are only thinking about a textbook on MQL5.
We can't just give research grants. We have a broader mission.