Vladimir Pastushak: I think fail-safe + reliable = quality
I'm afraid that if values to the thousandths of a percent are important in a TS, that TS cannot be reliable.
But when it comes to pure code, a simple formula is certainly better than a switch() selector, and a selector is better than a tricky loop or a complex formula.
Allow the use of cookies to log in to the MQL5.com website.
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.
You are signed in. Two-factor authentication has been disabled. Set it up again and scan a new QR code, or continue with two-factor authentication disabled.
A masterpiece, absolutely.
It makes sense otherwise you get the wrong result...
Of course, what if the concept of "loyalty" is unusual and distinctive
A masterpiece, no doubt.
Of course, what if the notion of "fidelity" is unusual and distinctive?
By the way, yes, we should first define what we mean by "fidelity" and "quality" of the code.
By the way, yes, we should first define what we mean by 'fidelity' and 'quality' of code.
I think fail-safe + reliable = quality
I'm afraid that if values to the thousandths of a percent are important in a TS, that TS cannot be reliable.
But when it comes to pure code, a simple formula is certainly better than a switch() selector, and a selector is better than a tricky loop or a complex formula.
When I read that it takes 4-10 hours to calculate the signal, I feel uncomfortable.
Yes, the situation may change drastically during this time and the signal will not be relevant even on daily charts.
The code in a program can be long, but it must be calculated quickly. This is what is important nowadays.