F - page 27

New comment
 
Vinin:
Without risk, you can double in three months (or at optimal risk). If you try hard, you can do it in two months. And faster is the only thing that will help.
Automat shows a shorter time frame for doubling, and I agree with him. You can even triple in two days. The problem is the optimal percentage of risk, how to calculate it having at hand only the size of the deposit and the calculated statistical probability of error of the Expert Advisor?
 
_new-rena:
The machine shows a shorter doubling time frame as an example and I agree with him. You can even triple it in two days. The problem is the optimal percentage of risk, how to calculate it having at hand only the size of the deposit and the statistical probability of error of the Expert Advisor?
It seems you do not take risks into account. The work of tractors indicates an overestimated risk. With the optimum risk the picture could be very different. It takes at least two months to double, perhaps three months
 
Vinin:
You don't seem to take risks into account. The operation of the tractors suggests an overestimated risk. With optimum risk, the picture could be very different. It takes at least two months to double, perhaps three months.
That's what I'm talking about. You have to know how to calculate the risk.
 
_new-rena:
That's what I'm talking about. You have to be able to calculate the risk.
But some people ignore that approach. That's why the competition continues. True, I do not know with whom and why. I only know where the result will go (if of course there will be one).
 
Vinin:
But someone is ignoring this approach. And so the competition goes on. I really don't know with whom and why. I only know where the result will go (if of course there will be one).
I support you, I only managed to triple on gold in 9 months. It's risky to go any further.
 
_new-rena:
start doubling your deposit in a week at the most, you'll see what I mean.
It's casino mode.
 
yosuf:
This is casino mode.
It's experience. I've been in a mess of 100% or more a year for a long time now. you can do that on almost any turntable. you have to dig a little deeper to get there.
 
_new-rena:
That's what I'm talking about. You have to know how to calculate the risk.

It's not the best option to use 'optimal F', but something along the lines of that would be nice to use.

imho, that so far has not lost - it means there is potential for improvement) But there are very large losses, if a smaller percentage of the deposit per transaction was used, the current balance was greater... probably.

 
Swan:

Not the best option to use "optimal F", but something along the lines of that would be nice to use.

Imho, that so far has not lost - it means there is potential for improvement) But there are very large losses, if a smaller percentage of the deposit per transaction would be used, the current balance was greater... probably.

It feels that the EA of the Automat is very good. and my risk is not good. maybe we can solve the common problem together...
 

There is an elementary untried idea. For example: we set the risk of N trades - i.e. after N unprofitable trades the deposit is drained. Previous unprofitable trade - use depo/N for sl. A profitable trade - the lot is either only increased or remains the same, so that the deposit would be enough for N trades...

Um... I'm not sure I've made myself clear.)

1...202122232425262728293031323334...106
New comment