How do I get my money back for the signal if the signal provider drained my deposit 5 days after I signed up for a paid subscription? - page 8

 
pronych:
I am not mixing it up. I just think that the principle of shared responsibility for the capital's fate is more fair, like in pammam. You cannot clearly make money there by losing. You may make money on signals. Do not trade at all if you want.

No, I don't agree.

When you take money, you are responsible for it with your head.

But here, a man is just showing off - look how I make money. and whoever wants to do this repeats it. but only at their own risk. and if they want to, they do it selectively.

What is the distributor's responsibility if he no longer feels like it?

If you want to be responsible, you may provide signals only from real accounts with an active history of at least XX days.

Документация по MQL5: Стандартные константы, перечисления и структуры / Состояние окружения / Информация о счете
Документация по MQL5: Стандартные константы, перечисления и структуры / Состояние окружения / Информация о счете
  • www.mql5.com
Стандартные константы, перечисления и структуры / Состояние окружения / Информация о счете - Документация по MQL5
 
pronych:
I am not confused. Just the principle of mutual responsibility for the fate of the capital, as in PAMM, seems more fair to me. You cannot make money there by losing. You may make money on signals. Do not trade at all if you want.

What actually keeps you from investing in PAMM?

If everything is fair there, as opposed to signals ;)

 
There you have it - people's opinions. There is no accountability in the signals. Reminds me of the anonymous Arakulof from various forums.) Only now they pay for it))) And automatics...
 

I think it's a pretty good suggestion to refund the signal fee if there was a loss for the period.

At least optionally. Allow the signal provider to tick a box saying that he does not claim the signal fee if there is a loss for the period. This would be a kind of insurance, would introduce some fairness and protect the signal from jamming, i.e. make the trader treat the signal more carefully.

 
Armen:

No, I don't agree.

When you take money, you are responsible for it with your head.

But here, a man is just showing off - look how I make money. and whoever wants to do this repeats it. but only at their own risk. and if they want to, they do it selectively.

What is the distributor's responsibility if he no longer feels like it?

As for the other forex brokers, the real reports are more detailed and detailed enough to allow them to provide the required information.

Greetings.

1.When you take money, you are responsible for it with your head. i agree. When you as an investor invest money (you are not responsible for your own money with your head? Investing is also a science! many people take years to learn).

When you invest your money, you cannot be held responsible for your actions. 2. i have no idea where else to show it. maybe there is an account monitoring system for that, or do you want to take his word for it?

3.and what is the distributor's responsibility if he stopped being happy? The word "forfeit" is not reminiscent of the casino? For a fort may be a week, two, a month or several (watch point one - you as an investor should understand who is playing, and who is working, you have made a detailed account monitoring) Learn, learn and learn again!

4.if you want responsibility - you can simply make signals only fromreal accounts with an active history of at least XX days. Responsibility will not increase from this - no need to ask for it! Any sane - working signal provider will always work for a subscriber, unlike the player, because he is interested in long-term prospects! It makes no difference what account is used to broadcast the signal, be it a demo or real!

 

! Therefore, it does not matter which account is broadcasting the signal, whether it is a demo or real !

---------

As for the real account, it makes sense to use a real trading robot and you don't need to put in any profit.

As for the real account, my approach is more cautious. unless, of course, it is 10-100 quid.

I don't have 10,000 on it. I don't think I'm gonna lose it, even if I have 2,000 subscribers sitting there.

With 100 quid, I could lose it because the amount is insignificant.

Документация по MQL5: Стандартные константы, перечисления и структуры / Состояние окружения / Информация о счете
Документация по MQL5: Стандартные константы, перечисления и структуры / Состояние окружения / Информация о счете
  • www.mql5.com
Стандартные константы, перечисления и структуры / Состояние окружения / Информация о счете - Документация по MQL5
 
trora:

! Therefore, it does not matter which account is broadcasting the signal, whether it is a demo or real !

---------

As for the real account, it may be the best way to trade on the real one.

As for the real account, my approach is more cautious. unless, of course, it is 10-100 quid.

I don't have 10,000 on it. I don't think I'm gonna lose it, even if I have 2,000 subscribers sitting there.

With 100 quid, I may lose it because the amount is insignificant.

Don't judge people by themselves! Once again, I will repeat - any sensible - working signal provider will always work for subscribers, unlike the player,because he is interested in long-term prospects! It makes no difference what account is used to broadcast the signal, be it a demo or real! 10-100$ is also money, I would like to remind you,

PS. And we should never forget about ruthless, unforgiving competition among signals providers, and not only among them! All the more so, everything that is paid for passes through passport control (then with this "interface" showcased everywhere - find your subscribers). I will get tired of constantly changing passports and then earn interest, and God forbid you get into the top 100! There are more than12050 trading signals available for subscriptionin theSignalssection. You can try it with either a demo or a real signal.

 
trora:

! Therefore, it does not matter which account is broadcasting the signal, whether it is a demo or real !

---------

As for the real account, it makes sense to use a real trading robot and you don't need to put in any profit.

As for the real account, my approach is more cautious. unless, of course, it is 10-100 quid.

I don't have 10,000 on it. I don't think I'd want to lose it, even if I had 2,000 subscribers sitting there.

With 100 quid - I can drain it because the amount is insignificant.

"... 10,000 viewers at 1 ruble... 2 write 7 in mind... crazy money!" (C) A. Raikin.

2000 subscribers for $ 10 - voila, and a deposit of $ 10,000 won in one month + profit! In other words, the size of the deposit from the real account is not the main thing. Of course, some kind of moral and material compensation should be introduced.

 

I disagree...

The difference between a demo and a real account is a big one. we're not talking about adequacy and decency, but responsibility. a demo account drain is just a loss of image. nothing more than that.

The difference between a demo and a real account is nothing but the loss of one's own money.

As for the 2000 subscribers, do you know many such signals?

of course 1100% profit a month(https://www.mql5.com/ru/signals/12101)- it's cool to use someone else's hands, but maybe you should understand that a person who makes 1000% a month will hardly show his strategy to anyone ...

Торговые сигналы: Hlaiman EA Generator 007
Торговые сигналы: Hlaiman EA Generator 007
  • reviews: 15
  • 2013.08.07
  • Ivan Negreshniy
  • www.mql5.com
Торговый Сигнал Hlaiman EA Generator 007 для MetaTrader 5: копирование сделок, мониторинг счета, автоматическое исполнение сигналов и социальный трейдинг
 
Armen:

I disagree...

The difference between a demo and a real account is a big one. we're not talking about adequacy and decency, but responsibility. a demo account drain is just a loss of image. nothing more than that.

The difference between a demo and a real account is nothing but the loss of one's own money.


Here's the loss of his image, his reputation, hissubscribers, and at the end of his PRIORITY - which in most cases is earned over the years - THIS IS THE COMPLETE CATASTROPHE! Compared to draining a real account . Maybe you will understand it someday!

PS. There is a very good saying - first you work for your name and then the name works for you !

Reason: