Pure maths, physics, logic (braingames.ru): non-trade-related brain games - page 120

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I believe the decision can be discounted.
The claim is to the moderators of braingames.ru. The task is not mine, I only placed the ad.
Here's a flower problem:
(1) How many flowers do I have if all but two are roses, all but two are tulips and all but two are daisies? Give at least two answers.
Alas, I haven't found the problem withbig weight about flowers yet...
The hardest ones often turn out to be sadistic.
Here's a flower problem:
(1) How many flowers do I have if all but two are roses, all but two are tulips and all but two are daisies? Give at least two answers.
Alas, I haven't found the problem withbigger weight...
The hardest ones often turn out to be sadistic.
Here's a flower problem:
(1) How many flowers do I have if all but two are roses, all but two are tulips and all but two are daisies? Give at least two answers.
Alas, I haven't found the problem withbigger weight...
The hardest ones often turn out to be sadistic.
I don't understand, what's the second option?
Generally speaking, the task is kind of silly. I'll tell you later about an option that, for some strange reason, didn't go through.
Yes, two daisies would do. Or two violets. Or a sunflower and a nettle.
Now let's ask the moderator of braingames.ru: what housewife would say "all" to an empty set? That's nonsense, although technically it's fine.
My second choice was the following: M roses, N tulips, K daisies (all numbers at least 1). And "all but two" I applied not to instances of flowers, but to types. The answer didn't go through.
Mischek: Даже цветы , даже ЦВЕТЫ должны страдать у этого брейнагеймса
OK, it's a deal, we'll look specifically for you to solve problems without mockery. But then don't be offended if they are completely uninteresting or stupid like this.
:)