MQL5 training - page 7

 
abolk:
Denkir is stubborn. Look how many articles he has. There will be a poll and figures and a trial course and a video with funny pictures.

Yes, there is such a thing :-))

Ironicize in good health! ;-))

Some old men have gathered here, thrown their caps around...

 
denkir:

A set of lectures seems to me to be a very unpromising direction (plus you yourself have decided that the user needs them). There is no feedback. This scheme seems much more interesting to me:

  • There is a list of topics, each topic can be taught
  • Topics can be added
  • The user may vote on a theme.
  • The lesson will be run on the theme that gets the most votes
  • The listener only pays for one lesson

I also agree that this is for very lazy people, considering the fact that the reference on ICL is in Russian.

 
220Volt:

A set of lectures seems to me to be a very unpromising direction (plus you yourself have decided that the user needs them). There is no feedback. This scheme seems much more interesting to me:

  • There is a list of topics, each topic can be taught
  • Topics can be added
  • The user may vote on a theme.
  • The lesson will be run on the theme that gets the most votes
  • The listener only pays for one lesson

I also agree that this is for very lazy people, considering the fact that the reference on ICL is in Russian.

Yes, that's my decision. Not claiming to be absolutely correct. My business is to suggest... though that does not mean that I am not prepared to listen to the opinions of other specialists... Here colleague abolk has made some very valid points...

220Volt, your scheme can be very handy and is flexible. But. To implement it, it seems to me, you need to spend a few more dozens of man-hours. I'm not ready to do that yet...

 
As a seed, I will consider a situation in MQL5, when locks cannot be used (as in MQL4), we can use hedging. The netting in MQL5 has already been discussed in this thread, so let's consider how to hedge without locks...
 
denkir:

As a seed, I will consider a situation in MQL5, when locks cannot be used (as in MQL4), we can use hedging. The netting in MQL5 has already been discussed in this thread, so let's consider how to hedge without locks...
What is hedging instead of locks and what does it have to do with programming?
 
Mischek:
What is hedging instead of locs ? and what does this have to do with programming ?
Mischek:
are you sort of implying that all this will be in the "Interesting and Humorous" thread ?
 
denkir:
Mischek:
are you suggesting that it's all going to be in the "Interesting and Humorous" thread?

"Not that one, chief, not that one."

And here's an answer to a specific question, I'd like to hear.

 

Gentlemen!

Interesting polemics in 7 pages.

I suggest giving a little test to a future teacher.

For example:

A 3-hour schedule.

At the beginning of every third hour

indicator1 - places buy stop order or

indicator2 - places sell stop order.

Intersection of indicators 3 and 4 closes

Every 3 hours check indicators 1 and 2,

If one of them triggers, we close the ORDER (if any) and place a new one.

Use only

void OnTick()

{

}

Show me the code, please.

Mikhail

 
Mikalas:

Gentlemen!

Interesting polemics in 7 pages.

I suggest giving a little test to a future teacher.

For example:

........

Mr. Mikalas, I suggest that teachers should not be tested by the forum. To exclude possible abuses:

1. Collusion between the "examiner" and the candidate. Or worse - with his rival.

2. obtaining free solutions under the pretext of "testing".

--

Besides, in this case, if I got a tech assignment like that , I'd send you

because there's a lot of confusion, even for me, even though I'm very understanding... :)

 
Mikalas:

Gentlemen!

Interesting polemics in 7 pages.

I suggest giving a little test to a future teacher.

For example:

A 3-hour schedule.

At the beginning of every third hour

indicator1 - places buy stop order or

indicator2 - places sell stop order.

Intersection of indicators 3 and 4 closes

Every 3 hours check indicators 1 and 2,

If one of them triggers, we close the ORDER (if any) and place a new one.

We only use

void OnTick()

{

}

Show me the code, please.

Mikhail


Michael, would you like to go and test yourself on such idiot tests.
Reason: