Artificial Intelligence 2020 - is there progress? - page 50
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Strange of course that the progress of quantum computer development has stalled. Incredible, god-like results were promised but, all is quiet. It instantaneously unfolds all combinations of bit complex states due to quantum superposition property, but apart from cipher breaking no application has been found yet...
Data and procedures come together. Quantum is better with only a few states, but procedures and data are also in the same array/memory and accessed sequentially.
Data and procedures are combined. Quantum is better with only a few states, but procedures and data are also in the same array/memory and access to them is consistent.
https://3dnews.ru/1015293
A breakthrough is looming. If this technology is combined with the same innovative conceptual framework of the MoD, we get a new generation of AI.
It seems that the whole point there is low power consumption. Back in 2012, they showed neural network computers on the BBC. However, such a CPU will not compete with the modern CPU in terms of computing power, at least for now.
It seems that the whole point there is low power consumption. Back in 2012, they showed a show on the BBC about neural networks. However, such a processor will not compete with the modern CPU in terms of computing power, at least not yet.
Well, the article talks about an order of magnitude increase in transaction speed. I don't know what these claims are based on technically, but I believe it so far...
The accuracy will float depending on the ambient tundra/desert temperature, the heat of the chip itself after switching on, over time the parameters of some elements also float. Plus noise will change values, in the field there are few, under power lines some, in the city others, near radio transmitters others, etc.
For rough calculations +-20% may be fine.
On the article: the key phrase there " "Analog" technology allows almost the same result when multiplying vector matrices with the assumption of less accuracy than when using data as digital 0 and 1. "
The accuracy will float depending on the ambient tundra/desert temperature, the heat of the chip itself after switching on, over time the parameters of some elements also float. Plus noise will change values, in the field there are few, under power lines some, in the city others, near radio transmitters others, etc.
For rough calculations +-20% may be fine.
As for the article: the key phrase there " "Analog" technology allows you to get almost the same result by multiplying vector matrices with the assumption of less accuracy than using digital 0 and 1 data. "
The accuracy will float depending on the ambient tundra/desert temperature, the heat of the chip itself after switching on, over time the parameters of some elements also float. Plus noise will change values, in the field there are few, under power lines some, in the city others, near radio transmitters others, etc.
For rough calculations +-20% may be fine.
In general, it's cool to put together an analog transducer for the Schrodinger equation, you can if you set your mind to it, and it's easy to implement simple mathematical functions, but making it small and many is a real challenge.) It's like putting a mechanical arithmometer into a computer chip. 1987 my diploma in laser rangefinder was a CCD with 24 elements, and it measured up to 1mm by the way.)
Roughness of calculation is solved by quantity.