Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 3652

 
Maxim Dmitrievsky #:
1. Then we'll be on the same level?))
2. I am not arguing with anyone, but discussing points.

1. You can then consider that yes, if it's important to you.

2. You'll discuss the points.

[Deleted]  
You do it, we'll talk about it. Don't eat up other people's time. I've gotten 0 use out of you so far. Trends tend to persist.
 
Maxim Dmitrievsky #:
I've solved your unsolvable problem. And it wasn't posed correctly. I had to guess, waste time.

Post the code, it's your chance for rehabilitation.

You're in no position to condition me right now :)

Shall I quote your post again, where you said that the problem is unsolvable? - The problem is solvable for me, I have never said anywhere that I can't solve it.

Accept the terms of the deal - I'll post the code.

I can set any conditions for you, I already have. It's up to you whether you agree or not.

I won't write more on this issue, you have to give me Yes or No in favour of the deal.

[Deleted]  
Andrey Dik #:

To quote your post again, where did you say that the problem is unsolvable? - The problem is solvable for me, I never said I couldn't solve it.

Accept the terms of the deal - I'll post the code.

I can set any conditions for you, I already have. It's up to you whether you agree or not.

I won't write more on this issue, you have to give me Yes or No in favour of the deal.

It's all your fantasy, unfortunately for you. There are no real facts.
 
I offered, you refused, you're a blabbermouth. This conversation is over.
[Deleted]  
Fantasies again :)
 
Maxim Dmitrievsky #:
Using the example of an integer multiplication table from 1 to 9 - you approximate the f- function with a neural network and it starts solving examples with fractional values because they are all inside the function. Like 1.2 * 2.4. But if you start multiplying by 10, 20, you won't get anything.

La, really.

J       0       22:54:40.278    Core 01 2021.01.04 00:00:00   9 * 0 = 0
NE      0       22:54:40.278    Core 01 2021.01.04 00:00:00   9 * 1 = 9
IN      0       22:54:40.278    Core 01 2021.01.04 00:00:00   9 * 2 = 18
FG      0       22:54:40.278    Core 01 2021.01.04 00:00:00   9 * 3 = 27
OO      0       22:54:40.278    Core 01 2021.01.04 00:00:00   9 * 4 = 36
DD      0       22:54:40.278    Core 01 2021.01.04 00:00:00   9 * 5 = 45
ML      0       22:54:40.278    Core 01 2021.01.04 00:00:00   9 * 6 = 54
JE      0       22:54:40.278    Core 01 2021.01.04 00:00:00   9 * 7 = 63
CM      0       22:54:40.278    Core 01 2021.01.04 00:00:00   9 * 8 = 72
HJ      0       22:54:40.278    Core 01 2021.01.04 00:00:00   9 * 9 = 81
EQ      0       22:54:40.278    Core 01 2021.01.04 00:00:00   9 * 10 = 86
FH      0       22:54:40.278    Core 01 2021.01.04 00:00:00   9 * 11 = 88
NP      0       22:54:40.278    Core 01 2021.01.04 00:00:00   9 * 12 = 89
GH      0       22:54:40.278    Core 01 2021.01.04 00:00:00   9 * 13 = 90
LS      0       22:54:40.278    Core 01 2021.01.04 00:00:00   9 * 14 = 90
IK      0       22:54:40.278    Core 01 2021.01.04 00:00:00   9 * 15 = 90
RR      0       22:54:40.278    Core 01 2021.01.04 00:00:00   9 * 16 = 90
KJ      0       22:54:40.278    Core 01 2021.01.04 00:00:00   9 * 17 = 90
PR      0       22:54:40.278    Core 01 2021.01.04 00:00:00   9 * 18 = 90
EM      0       22:54:40.278    Core 01 2021.01.04 00:00:00   9 * 19 = 90
 

(Multiplied 198383 * 595857 = 118,207,899,231 on a calculator)




- How much is 198383 times 595857

Mistral:

- 198383 times 595857 equals118278952791.



- How did you do the math?

Mistral:
- I did the multiplication in my mind (Holy s**t 😮)

[Deleted]  
Ivan Butko #:

La, for real.

That's why LLMs have trouble solving new problems :)
[Deleted]  
Check out the new feature in deepseek, there's a toggle above the text input line. Now it's thinking too. Haven't tested it much yet, just asked a few questions. On the question about the berry that unicorns eat, he went into an endless loop of thinking :)