Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 3291

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
You volunteered to do justice even though there was a conceptual matstat issue there 😁
which was answered in the thread, they even tried to translate the whole thing.
Let's elaborate on how you explain it. As far as I remember with the aplift topic you failed to find the data change point in the predictor, i.e. the effect is sort of there, but you can't detect when it started. Or are you talking about something else?
Let's explain it in more detail. As far as I remember with the topic of aplift, you failed to find the point of data change in the predictor, i.e. there is an effect, but it is impossible to detect when it started. Or are you talking about something else?
Book aplift doesn't work on strong noise, custom one does.
The book aplift doesn't work on high noise, the custom one does.
Would you like to tell about your achievements in this area?
How often do such changes in samples occur, according to your observations?
I've rather seen a stochastic process....
Would you like to share your achievements in this area?
How often do such changes in samples occur, according to your observations?
I've seen more of a stochastic process....
I also noticed that there should be few signs, then all sorts of kozul inferences are counted normally. Otherwise, algorithms get confused in the readings.
In general, how many indicators should there be in a TS to make it work normally. Obviously not 100 or 500. Usually it is 2-3, well 10 at most.
I also noticed that there should be few signs, then all sorts of kozul inferences are counted normally. Otherwise algorithms get confused in readings.
In general, how many indicators should there be in a TS to make it work normally. Obviously not 100 or 500. Usually it is 2-3, well 10.
.
.
It can't be the other way round, it is exactly as it is written, based on the experiment.
It can't be the other way round, exactly as written, based on experimentation
on the basis of what experiment? - You can answer "personal", but that's not a very good answer.