Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 2448
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I think there is a chance. For example, Saber uses a very specific inefficiency, which is described by a very specific figure. It can be measured, it is stationary for a long time. To calculate it (and to detect inefficiency) you don't need to bruteforce TC parameters .
Chances are always there ...
"specific ineffectiveness" is the most unspecific phrase you can utter ))
What is "ineffective" as you define it?
If it's the spread between Gazprom and Sberbank, that's one thing,
If you just made up a price curve, it's a statistical one, but it's impossible to make money on it.
If you found some frequency in the spectrum, it's the third, if the forecast is the fourth and so on...
Divorcee. "Pie salesman" -- see from 19:30 -- that's what he's talking about.
Well, the "efficient market" nonsense -- he doesn't know what it's about at all. He doesn't understand that this fraud (the theory of the "efficient market") is in and of itself an instrument of bribery. Understanding this he has not mastered.
I agree that CyberDad is not a very good trader. I just wanted to draw attention to the rules he talks about. Most of them are real, and about selling by the pie or near-market business is true for me. I started to think about it, I came back to the idea whether I should finish my book and earn on it. What do you think?
I think everyone has their own way.
I think everyone has their own way.
There are always chances...
"specific ineffectiveness" is the least specific phrase you can say.)
What do you mean by "ineffective"?
If it's the spread between Gazprom and Sberbank, that's one thing,
If you've just made up a price curve, it's a statistical one, but you cannot make money on it.
If you have found some frequency in the spectrum, it is the third, if the forecast is the fourth, etc...
Without HFT it is useless information...
If you add the entropy of a number of, say, transaction directions to the estimate of the balance curve on the test. Does it make sense theoretically?
If you add the entropy of a number of, say, transaction directions to the estimate of the balance curve on the test. Purely theoretically, does it make sense?
What do you want to get out of it?
If you add the entropy of a number of, say, transaction directions to the estimate of the balance curve on the test. Theoretically, does it make sense?
Why Balance and not Funds? The drawdown of equity is always worse than that of the balance.