Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 2185

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Does anyone know the technology to represent several values by one with the possibility of converting back to several
with little or no loss of precision
There's no easy one. All combinations in the dictionary and hash keys
there is no simple one. All combinations in the dictionary and hash keys
maybe autoencoder...
maybe an autoencoder...
Yes, hash with NS is easier to get simpler and more stable).
By the way, yes, how was the pussy? Who had the longest? The fact that Rinat kicks a martin immediately understandable by the curve of funds. But what will respond to it the other contestant Maksimka?
Makhimka will not lose. He took a deposit with a large margin, so as not to lose.
Who can tell me why the MT5 is not installed in Colab?
command: !pip install MetaTrader5
Gives two errors - Could not find a version that satisfies the requirement MetaTrader5==5.0.33 (from versions: none)
No matching distribution found for MetaTrader5==5.0.33
This question should be asked in another thread
Do you know how to represent several values by one with the possibility of converting back to several,
with minimumloss of accuracy or without
For example with the same umap you can compress data into one vector, but there is no inverse function
You don't know how to represent several values by one with the possibility of converting back to several,
with minimal or noloss of accuracy.
For example you can use umap to compress data into a single vector, but there is no inverse function
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qN3n0TM4Jno&ab_channel=VenelinValkov
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4J74KstHTE&ab_channel=VenelinValkovhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qN3n0TM4Jno&ab_channel=VenelinValkov
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4J74KstHTE&ab_channel=VenelinValkovYou can do it through the pca
https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/229092/how-to-reverse-pca-and-reconstruct-original-variables-from-several-principal-com
But if you restore only one component at a time, the losses are too big (
And in the trailer it does not matter what to restore with and that is bad (
But we will try!
Mahimka is not going to lose. He took the deposit with a large margin, so as not to lose.