Hello Maxim Dmitrievsky. I just read your email. There's nothing on githab. I took a simple network code and modified it to suit me. What was decisive for me was removing the garbage from the tick history. Python
Hmmm... i don't really get it... so you removed all repetitive prices... i don't know what that gives
You understand what this is for? When we're in a flat, then the most important thing is not to lose money. And the trend is easily recognized by the network. The most important thing for a neural network after guessing the trend direction during a flat.
NeuralNetwork: You understand what this is for? When we're in a flat, then the most important thing is not to lose money. And the trend is easily recognized by the network. The most important thing for a neural network is to guess the direction of the trend during a flat.
Well... it depends on what you teach. What to enter and what to exit
NeuralNetwork: You understand what this is for? When we're in a flat, then the most important thing is not to lose money. And the trend is easily recognized by the network. The most important thing for a neural network is to guess the trend direction during a flat.
Why not record the accumulation of ticks in a selected window?
If that's what you mean, I already fix the number of ticks
I meant that it would rather aggregate the price of ticks in a flat, for example with a negative value, as soon as you understood what is in the flat in the form of a separate predicator. If you removed repetitive prices, then the predictors were removed with them, or did you build them on cleared ticks?
I rather meant that it would aggregate the price of ticks in the flat, for example by a negative value, as soon as you understood what is in the flat in the form of a separate predicator. If you remove repetitive prices, then predictors are removed with them, or you construct them using already cleared ticks?
My network is set up in such a way that I may build on cleared ones.
I've tested it with spread - well, it seems to drag, it's worse. I will rewrite it for the terminal next week and it will be possible to put it for tests.
Allow the use of cookies to log in to the MQL5.com website.
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.
You are signed in. Two-factor authentication has been disabled. Set it up again and scan a new QR code, or continue with two-factor authentication disabled.
Hello Maxim Dmitrievsky. I just read your email. There's nothing on githab. I took a simple network code and modified it to suit me. What was decisive for me was removing the garbage from the tick history. Python
Hmmm... i don't really get it... so you removed all repetitive prices... i don't know what that gives
Hmmm... I don't really understand... i.e. you removed all the repeating prices... it is unclear what this gives
I wanted to find the top and bottom for a certain number of ticks, so that the price is guided by them when training the neural network.
You understand what this is for? When we're in a flat, then the most important thing is not to lose money. And the trend is easily recognized by the network. The most important thing for a neural network is to guess the direction of the trend during a flat.
Well... it depends on what you teach. What to enter and what to exit
You understand what this is for? When we're in a flat, then the most important thing is not to lose money. And the trend is easily recognized by the network. The most important thing for a neural network is to guess the trend direction during a flat.
Why not record the accumulation of ticks in a selected window?
Why not record the accumulation of ticks for the selected window?
If that's what you mean I'm fixing the number of ticks
If that's what you mean, I already fix the number of ticks
I meant that it would rather aggregate the price of ticks in a flat, for example with a negative value, as soon as you understood what is in the flat in the form of a separate predicator. If you removed repetitive prices, then the predictors were removed with them, or did you build them on cleared ticks?
I rather meant that it would aggregate the price of ticks in the flat, for example by a negative value, as soon as you understood what is in the flat in the form of a separate predicator. If you remove repetitive prices, then predictors are removed with them, or you construct them using already cleared ticks?
My network is set up in such a way that I may build on cleared ones.
My network is set up so that I build on cleared ones. You should try it.
And what kind of predictors go to the input - increments?
I've tested it with spread - well, it seems to drag, it's worse. I will rewrite it for the terminal next week and it will be possible to put it for tests.