Maxim Dmitrievsky: The fortuneteller did not see the chelists, i.e. anonymously. Just asked her short questions by different people and they evaluated the answer. No one knows each other. I just wondered what the psychological effect was. Thought I would fall out nonsense on the cards, and they're on point.)
The same place the amoeba "knows" from. What's the fortune teller?)
Researchers have demonstrated that an amoeba—a single-celled organism consisting mostly of gelatinous protoplasm—has unique computing abilities that may one day offer a competitive alternative to the methods used by conventional computers. The researchers, led by Masashi Aono at Keio University, assigned an amoeba to solve the Traveling...
I did manage to train a neural network. For BTCUSD it predicts movement every minute for the next 15 min (without reference to candlesticks). The neural response is binary up/down and expressed as a numerical value in the range from -70 to +70, this is not a price prediction, it is a degree of confidence in the movement. Now in the real market, the result is higher than expected. During the backtest 68% of successful answers turned out to be much better. I trained without crutches and hints, i.e. no external influence, everything I trained worked. The data has been prepared with MQL5 bot, TensorFlow + Keras neuron, now it sends my predictions to Telegram channel. I don't give the link here, it seems to be impossible, but if I can let me know.
In fact I got an indicator which gives out a value on every minute candle. At values of 30 and above I can try to trade)
I will answer the questions, but I will leave know-how about data preparation for training ...
That says nothing, as you know. What is the expected payoff?
Of course it doesn't say anything, but the real market does. The forecast is absolutely correct, the guessing of trends and forthcoming reversals is very good, so to say. better than all known indicators. All this is public. Mat expectation was not counted.
Evgeny Dyuka: But the real market says, the forecast is absolutely adequate, the guessing of trends and upcoming reversals is very good, so to say... Better than all the known indicators. All this is public.
The percentage of guessing does not say anything, there can be 99% of profitable guesses and 1% of unprofitable, which will cover all the profits.
Percentage of guesses does not say anything, can be 99% of guesses are profitable and 1% of unprofitable, which will cover all the profits.
Why so?
You can convince me that I'm wrong. This project I did six months for 16 hours a day and got the result. I can not show you because you are waiting for the link that I give will be advertising casinos.
A counter question, and where else to discuss this topic as on the profile forum? Maybe for safety we equip the delegate from the forum, he put on a protective suit, shodt on link, observe and tell - there or not a casino. After that we'll discuss.
Percentage of guesses does not say anything, can be 99% of guesses are profitable and 1% of unprofitable, which will cover all the profits.
Why?
The percentage of guesses is not important in this topic, there are other categories. The main thing here is whether the network is learning or not. If it shows signs of learnability, the door is open, and then the quality of the prediction can be increased infinitely. Everything will depend on equipment and time.
Allow the use of cookies to log in to the MQL5.com website.
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.
You are signed in. Two-factor authentication has been disabled. Set it up again and scan a new QR code, or continue with two-factor authentication disabled.
Example data.
Example data.
Have you triedCatBoost?
The fortuneteller did not see the chelists, i.e. anonymously. Just asked her short questions by different people and they evaluated the answer. No one knows each other. I just wondered what the psychological effect was. Thought I would fall out nonsense on the cards, and they're on point.)
The same place the amoeba "knows" from. What's the fortune teller?)
I did manage to train a neural network. For BTCUSD it predicts movement every minute for the next 15 min (without reference to candlesticks). The neural response is binary up/down and expressed as a numerical value in the range from -70 to +70, this is not a price prediction, it is a degree of confidence in the movement.
Now in the real market, the result is higher than expected. During the backtest 68% of successful answers turned out to be much better. I trained without crutches and hints, i.e. no external influence, everything I trained worked.
The data has been prepared with MQL5 bot, TensorFlow + Keras neuron, now it sends my predictions to Telegram channel. I don't give the link here, it seems to be impossible, but if I can let me know.
In fact I got an indicator which gives out a value on every minute candle. At values of 30 and above I can try to trade)
I will answer the questions, but I will leave know-how about data preparation for training ...
On the backtest gave 68% of successful answers and life was much better.
That says nothing, as you know. What is the expectation of winning?
That says nothing, as you know. What is the expected payoff?
Mat expectation was not counted.
But the real market says, the forecast is absolutely adequate, the guessing of trends and upcoming reversals is very good, so to say... Better than all the known indicators. All this is public.
The percentage of guessing does not say anything, there can be 99% of profitable guesses and 1% of unprofitable, which will cover all the profits.
Mat expectation was not counted.
Why so?
Has anyone used the built-in python scripts and Metatrader5 library for Python yet?
Percentage of guesses does not say anything, can be 99% of guesses are profitable and 1% of unprofitable, which will cover all the profits.
Why so?
A counter question, and where else to discuss this topic as on the profile forum?
Maybe for safety we equip the delegate from the forum, he put on a protective suit, shodt on link, observe and tell - there or not a casino.
After that we'll discuss.
Percentage of guesses does not say anything, can be 99% of guesses are profitable and 1% of unprofitable, which will cover all the profits.
Why?