You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
A team of some mathematicians at the institute decided to try to exploit their findings in the financial markets. I took it for a lot of money, I won't reveal the details. I am not going to reveal any details.
I have a good relationship with my broker, so please let me know what you think.
A team of some mathematicians at the institute decided to try to exploit their findings in the financial markets. I took it for a lot of money, I'm not going to reveal the details. The main thing now is to gain a positive history on the real, but history is history, not an indicator (for everyone, I'm sure).
I do not know if it is the National Market or something else? What do you give for entry?
Good luck, write about the results sometimes
for sure, if there will be something to show) thank you
What do you give for entrance?
In the shower for tea, they found a D))) All you have to do is specify the number of layers and neurons. Well, one thing I can say: the more layers and neurons (100 layers, 100 neurons), the more useless (paradox). If I add 2-3 layers of 2-3 neurons, I gain something. Maybe I'm not trained properly - I don't know. Just started, I'll check more.
UPDOh, and some kind of "regression" or "classification" to choose from - one of two.
***
Kesha, how old are you?
mbm, I'll finish later and compare what I got without making up anything extra.
In my opinion, the statement about memory loss when going to differences is not particularly important for the further statement. You could just say something along the lines of postulating that memory is only determined by price levels. But perhaps I just don't understand the book business and so I won't insist)
If we proceed from this postulate, then we come to the usual notion of price as a diffusion process in a heterogeneous space of prices. There is, however, an essential difference from physical diffusion - there a particle usually does not affect the properties of the space. The price changes it because when it reaches some new level, the orders set there are triggered and new ones are added at other levels.
In my opinion, the statement about the loss of memory in the transition to differences is not particularly important for the further statement. One could just say something like postulate that memory is determined only by price levels. But perhaps I just don't understand the book business and so I won't insist)
If we proceed from this postulate, then we come to the usual notion of price as a diffusion process in a heterogeneous space of prices. There is, however, an essential difference from physical diffusion - there a particle usually does not affect the properties of the space. The price changes it, because when it reaches some new level, the orders set there are triggered and new ones are added at other levels.
Actually, it says so directly :)
In fact, it says so directly :)
OK) let's put it aside for clarity)