//+------------------------------------------------------------------+//| Random double in the range [min, max) |//| Generates doubles rounded down to the nearest multiple of 1/2^15 |//+------------------------------------------------------------------+double MathRandDbl(constdouble min, constdouble max)
{
double f = (MathRand() / 32768.0);
return min + (f * (max - min));
}
Hi, Amir. I would like to point to a subtle issue in your answer, that is the modulo bias.
Because, modulo by 100 does not divide the RAND_MAX range evenly, as the range of mql random number generator is from 0 to 32767 (i.e., RAND_MAX = 2^15 - 1).
So it will lead to modulo bias. As a result, the generated random numbers in the range 0 to 0.67 will have a higher chance to appear than those in the range 0.68 to 1.0
The vast majority of my posts about random number generation have focused on looking at the properties of different generation schemes. But, perhaps surprisingly, the performance of your randomized algorithm may hinge not on the generation scheme you chose, but on other factors. In this post (inspired by and building on an excellent recent...
Hi, Amir. I would like to point to a subtle issue in your answer, that is the modulo bias.
Because, modulo by 100 does not divide the RAND_MAX range evenly, as the range of mql random number generator is from 0 to 32767 (i.e., RAND_MAX = 2^15 - 1).
So it will lead to modulo bias. As a result, the generated random numbers in the range 0 to 0.67 will have a higher chance to appear than those in the range 0.68 to 1.0
Allow the use of cookies to log in to the MQL5.com website.
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.
You are signed in. Two-factor authentication has been disabled. Set it up again and scan a new QR code, or continue with two-factor authentication disabled.
Could you explain how your reply relates to the original post?
MQL5 has its own.
Than kyou for pointing this out. In fact i did not come across these functions.
Or simply for the case [0, 1)
For a more reliable usage, use CRandom library.
https://www.mql5.com/en/code/25843
Or just use (for 0 to 1 doubles)
Hi, Amir. I would like to point to a subtle issue in your answer, that is the modulo bias.
Because, modulo by 100 does not divide the RAND_MAX range evenly, as the range of mql random number generator is from 0 to 32767 (i.e., RAND_MAX = 2^15 - 1).
So it will lead to modulo bias. As a result, the generated random numbers in the range 0 to 0.67 will have a higher chance to appear than those in the range 0.68 to 1.0
For more thorough explanation of modulo bias please see http://www.pcg-random.org/posts/bounded-rands.html
Thank you.
Hi, Amir. I would like to point to a subtle issue in your answer, that is the modulo bias.
Because, modulo by 100 does not divide the RAND_MAX range evenly, as the range of mql random number generator is from 0 to 32767 (i.e., RAND_MAX = 2^15 - 1).
So it will lead to modulo bias. As a result, the generated random numbers in the range 0 to 0.67 will have a higher chance to appear than those in the range 0.68 to 1.0
For more thorough explanation of modulo bias please see http://www.pcg-random.org/posts/bounded-rands.html
Thank you.
That's correct. If OP needs an unbiased random, better use one of the unbiased options to calculate it.