Discussion of article "The market and the physics of its global patterns" - page 3
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
There is some overlap with the first part of the article
Forum on trading, automated trading systems and testing trading strategies
Machine learning in trading: theory, practice, trading and more
Rorschach, 2021.01.10 19:11
Was the retraining going on all the time?
How to solve the problem? need to predict the mashka for half a period ahead.
There are 3 sources of information:
1) analysing the mashka itself and extrapolating it
2) if we move the mashka by half a period, its prediction is reduced to price approximation.
3) there are several currency pairs linked by a ratio. The simplest case is eurusd and usdeur, the prediction on one must match the prediction on the other. The more pairs are involved, the more accurate the prediction should be.
It is necessary to combine these three tasks into one equation.
There is some overlap with the first part of the article
First of all, the range where it (MA-shka) can be located is, to put it mildly, a bit predictable.
We know half of the data of MA (if we mean SMA), plus we know the statistics of price deviations and future volatility very precisely.
That is, the SMA and any MA in general in the future lies not in some way and unknown where, but quite within the known limits of places...
I have already shown on the forum how to determine the area of future SMA laying using the terminal's standard tools .
First of all, the range of where she might even be is, to put it mildly, a little predictable.
We know half of the data of the MA-shka (if about SMA), plus we know the statistics of price deviations and the future volatility very precisely.
i.e. SMA and any MA in general in the future lies not in some way and unknown where, but quite within the known limits of places...
I have already shown on the forum how to determine the area of future SMA laying using the terminal's standard tools .
It would be good to combine this into one formula and add multicurrency.
But seriously, I call physics the mechanics of the market, or rather its mechanics that can work indefinitely. And these mechanics are very simple in fact. Plus I want to show that regularities should be searched not for 1 year of history, but for 10 years at least, or better 20 years. The question is generally speaking complex. Everyone here is looking for something useful to create systems of their own, I only share my modest but experience.
In the price there are no "mechanics" that can "work" 10-20 years. Well, unless by "work" do not understand beautiful pictures from the tester.
If you replace the word physics in the title with the words chemistry, biology, sociology, chiromancy or homeopathy, the meaning of the article will not change - the topic has nothing to do with any of these words.
There are no "mechanics" in the price that can "work" for 10-20 years. Well, unless by "work" you don't mean beautiful pictures from the tester.
If you replace the word physics in the title with the words chemistry, biology, sociology, chiromancy or homeopathy, the meaning of the article will not change - the topic has nothing to do with any of these words.
There are mechanics, but you have not found them. The market is flat, that's the basic mechanics. Flat is waves. By the way, I'm not the only one talking about it. Look at Maxim Romanov's articles. He explains it in detail.
The mechanics are there, you just haven't found them. The market is flat, that's the basic mechanics. A flat is a wave. By the way, I'm not the only one talking about it. Look at Maxim Romanov's articles. He explains it in detail.
When Maxim Romanov makes a billion, I'll take a look.
What exactly is the "flute" market? Define the term. And stop using scientific terms to give weight to your articles. Well, like children - one uses quantum mechanics, the other string theory?
When Maxim Romanov makes a billion, I'll watch.
What exactly is the "flute" market? Define the term. And stop using scientific terms to give weight to your articles. Well, like children - one uses quantum mechanics, the other string theory?
here is a detailed description of what a flat is https://www.mql5.com/en/articles/8274.
here is a detailed description of what a flat is https://www.mql5.com/en/articles/8274
Thanks - I read it and laughed. I was especially amused by the definition of "chaotic market". It turns out that the probability of triggering protective orders depends on the market, not on their size!
So what is a flat market - give a mathematical definition?
Thanks - read it and laughed. I was especially amused by the definition of "chaotic market". It turns out that the probability of triggering protective orders depends on the market, not on their size!
So what is a flat market - give a mathematical definition of it
I already gave you a link to the article. You laughed. Well, I can't blame you for that. Flat is defined graphically. But we can also give a scalar characterisation of these processes. If we take a fixed number of steps and consider the reference distribution (distribution under the condition that the market is chaotic) we consider the modulo average price movement in the reference distribution and then we consider the modulo average price movement in the available distribution on the market, then the trend is the latter more than the reference distribution. Flat is respectively the opposite situation. The average modulus movement should be less than the reference one. You can also come up with a coefficient of movement to buy or sell similarly, plus ascending, minus descending. By the way, the article contains an example of an indicator that implements these two characteristics, if you have not understood. Satisfied? Or do you want me to throw formulas at you in Paints? Now I will ask you a question. What are you looking for in the articles for yourself?
I already gave you a link to the article. You laughed. Well, I can't blame you for that. Flat is graphically defined. But we can also give a scalar characterisation of these processes. If we take a fixed number of steps and consider the reference distribution (distribution under the condition that the market is chaotic) we consider the modulo average price movement in the reference distribution and then we consider the modulo average price movement in the available distribution on the market, then the trend is the latter more than the reference distribution. Flat is respectively the opposite situation. The average modulus movement should be less than the reference one. You can also come up with a coefficient of movement to buy or sell similarly, plus ascending, minus descending. By the way, the article contains an example of an indicator that implements these two characteristics, if you have not understood. Satisfied? Or do you want me to throw formulas at you in Paints? Now I will ask you a question. What are you looking for in the articles for yourself?
In this article, I was looking for an explanation of what physics has to do with it. It has nothing to do with physics.
In the first article I was interested in the definition of a 'chaotic market' - a funny link to the probability of protective orders triggering. I have a vague suspicion that as the size of orders decreases, the 'chaoticness' of any market increases.....