Discussion of article "How to make $1,000,000 off algorithmic trading? Use MQL5.com services!" - page 5

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
If you really want us to believe that money can be generated by algo makers using Freelance and Signals service of your site, please show some faces.
On the contrary, by putting out this plug a viewer will get a feeling that business is going down because of poor model.
Jobs placed for freelancers attract anonymous persons claiming to possess qualifications to do a job. There is no way of finding their previous work or how reliable they can be.
Strictly, if you make it compulsory for a freelancer to produce a video of showing prototype, finished indicator or EA working, order should not be placed.
This will attract people who are confident of their competence and skills and filter out coders who are looking for ideas to generate signals.
If you make a survey, it will surprise you to know that at least 90% of coders have done or doing the job not to make money for their time or labour but to get ideas to generate quick money.
Coders have been led to the garden path by motivated market noise that quick money can be made by coding algos.
Strongly believing in such talk, 90% of coders have collected ideas and have put their savings and have heavily lost.
Freelance service is being used by coders looking for ideas for their own use rather than to really sell their labout.
How can you explain the unrealistic prices they accept to do a job?
We optimise both the number of sales and total revenue.
Claims cannot be avoided in any action. We actively incentivise salespeople to work on trust.
As I pointed out above, salesperson profile/trust is the most important metric affecting sales.
Well, and I'll say it again - it's strange to hope for sales when the seller has only Russian (or one of 7) description of profile and products. The site is in 7 languages. Here even the presence of the English version is not enough.
in seven languages with full normal seo.... seo is clear it's one-time. And promotion is necessary?
in seven languages with full normal seo.... seo is understandably one-time. And promotion is necessary?
That's where the problem lies, not understanding the effectiveness.....
For example, plotting the trajectories of users' movements to purchase products shows constant loops of returns/returns within:
It turns out that a seller's personal profile is not just interesting to buyers, but is clearly the most important characteristic influencing a purchase. This makes sense - many buyers check the seller's status, ratings and professionalism.
And so the functionality of the wall itself can also be an influencer. For example, now it is not possible to use hyperlinks, YouTube player, when editing a post can not change the picture.
It also follows from the quote that if a product with negative reviews is on the list of products, it should be removed, because "a lousy sheep spoils the whole flock".
What influences the success of products:
Are there statistics in terms of prices for indicators and Expert Advisors? What price range has the highest percentage of purchases? It's just interesting to know the upper limit above which the total efficiency drops.
Although it is clear that 1 sale for 1000 is equal to 20 sales for 50, but in the second case the probability of leaving feedback and continuing sales is higher.
Oh those spammers in the feed, drawing asterisks, you'll get tired of cleaning it up
What about optimisation criteria for selecting providers for promotion to the Top?
What do subscribers usually pay attention to more often?
The criticism is that an unarmed eye can see who is chosen more often, they choose the one who has more subscribers, thus leaving out thousands of providers among which there are more worthy candidates.
this point should be optimised and a golden mean should be found, the essence of the algorithm is still unclear to the public.
After losing money, coders get caught in a spiral. Always looking to recover losses, <Deleted>.
Are you a coder?
How do you know all that?